Dealer · Agent

Michel van Rijn

1950–2024 · Netherlands

Dutch dealer who brought Peg Goldberg to the Kanakaria mosaics in 1988 and shared in the price, then in 1997 helped Cypriot and German authorities recover frescoes from Aydın Dikmen.

Biography

Michel van Rijn was one of the three middlemen who sold the Kanakaria church's mosaics to an Indianapolis dealer in 1988, and nine years later he was the buyer who brought frescoes stolen from northern Cyprus back out of Munich for the Church of Cyprus. He was born in 1950 and died in Italy on 25 July 2024, aged 737,8. Dan Hofstadter, who interviewed him, writes that he was the son of an Amsterdam gallery owner and dentist, and that Robert Fitzgerald, an American dealer, had known him since boyhood5.

A reputation before 1988

When the Kanakaria case reached court, his name was already attached to a conviction. In 1985 a French court had convicted him in absentia of forging Marc Chagall's signature on lithographs, and the Indiana court took judicial notice of that conviction and of his reputation1,2. Sullivan adds that he and Fitzgerald were being sued in Britain over a modello said to have been used by Michelangelo for the David, and Hoover that an art gallery had sued him for failure to pay1,2. A Scotland Yard detective, quoted without a name by Hofstadter, said that he had had a hand in many of the world's art-smuggling jobs and would be happy to claim all of them5. No court made such a finding.

The Kanakaria mosaics

On 1 July 1988 Fitzgerald introduced Peg Goldberg to van Rijn in Amsterdam, where van Rijn showed her photographs of four mosaics. Hofstadter reports that he told her they came from a church destroyed in 1974 and belonged to a Turkish archaeologist in Munich; the archaeologist was Aydın Dikmen, whom Sullivan says van Rijn presented to her as the former official archaeologist of Turkish Cyprus1,5. Van Rijn also told her of his French conviction, which he resented5. The California attorney Ronald Faulk acted as counsel to both Fitzgerald and van Rijn2,5.

The price was about $1.08 million. Kaiser reports that Dikmen received $350,000 and that Fitzgerald and van Rijn received $282,500 each3. Hofstadter reports that the two men took shares of the resale proceeds in place of a finder's fee, 22.5 per cent each and 5 per cent for Faulk. At the trial Fitzgerald testified that $350,000 went to Dikmen under a secret agreement among the three middlemen, $80,000 to Faulk, about $70,000 to a London attorney and $580,000 to himself and van Rijn together5. The Geneva hand-over of 5 July was made by Goldberg and Fitzgerald while van Rijn remained in Amsterdam5. Later in 1988 he telephoned Goldberg to say that Dikmen also held a fragment showing the Hand of Mary and the Feet of Christ, and a roundel of Saint Andrew. A second agreement for those pieces was signed on 10 February 1989, and the pieces were never reunited with the first four mosaics. The Indianapolis physician Stewart Bick paid $780,000 for half of van Rijn's and half of Fitzgerald's resale interests together5.

Van Rijn was not a party to Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg, but the court named him among the dealers who brought Goldberg to the mosaics3,5. At the trial in May 1989 Goldberg testified that he had given her Dikmen's credentials and dated the mosaics to the late fifth century. Judge Noland's order of 3 August 1989 awarded the mosaics to the Church of Cyprus and listed, as an alternative ground under Swiss law, that the middlemen were suspect5.

His own account, and others'

In The Hague in 1991 and 1992 van Rijn gave Hofstadter long interviews. He said that Goldberg knew exactly what the mosaics were and that he had given her the Dumbarton Oaks monograph; Goldberg has said she did not see it until weeks after the purchase5. Others made claims about him: Savo Kujundžić, an associate of Dikmen, alleged to Hofstadter that van Rijn had arranged for a friend to impersonate Dikmen at Geneva airport, and Fitzgerald repeated the allegation. Van Rijn denied it heatedly5. In 1993 he published a memoir, Hot Art, Cold Cash7.

Buying back from Dikmen

In February 1997 van Rijn approached Tasoula Hadjitofi, the honorary consul of Cyprus in The Hague and the Church of Cyprus's representative for stolen art, and offered to help buy back three mosaics and 44 frescoes. On 5 September 1997 he delivered the Kanakaria mosaic of Saint Thaddeus to the consulate. The next day he went to Munich and bought 25 frescoes from Dikmen through intermediaries with $75,000 of his own money; he took them to The Hague by chartered jet, where they were identified as coming from the church of Christ Antiphonitis. On 7 September he returned to Munich and arranged to buy seven larger frescoes for $49,00010.

In October 1997, with 32 frescoes and one mosaic recovered, Hadjitofi decided to move against Dikmen. According to Mark Rose, van Rijn and his intermediaries were granted immunity in the Netherlands, Cyprus and Germany, and police raided two of Dikmen's Munich apartments during a handover of money on 10 October and took him into custody10. Rose wrote in April 1998 that van Rijn, who had received death threats, was under the protection of Scotland Yard10. His website, which published material on the antiquities trade, was shut down in 20068.

Life and work

  1. 1985
    ConvictedConvicted in absentia by a French court of forging Marc Chagall's signature on lithographs.

    Sullivan 1991Hoover 1990

  2. 1 July 1988
    Met Goldberg in Amsterdam (Marriott sidewalk cafe) after Fitzgerald, who had known him since boyhood, introduced him; showed photographs of four mosaics; told her (per Hofstadter) that they came from a church destroyed in 1974 and belonged to a Turkish archaeologist in Munich; told her of his French in-absentia conviction, which he resented. Faulk was legal counsel to both Fitzgerald and van Rijn.

    AmsterdamHoover 1990Sullivan 1991Hofstadter 1994

  3. October 1988 – February 1989
    Phoned Goldberg in autumn 1988 to say Dikmen also held the Hand of Mary / Feet of Christ fragment and the Saint Andrew roundel; Goldberg says he grew possessive and tried to enlarge his resale share and take sole control of marketing. A second purchase agreement for these pieces was signed on 10 February 1989 by Goldberg, Fitzgerald, van Rijn and Bick; the mosaics were never reunited. Stewart Bick bought half of van Rijn's and half of Fitzgerald's resale interest for $780,000 in total.

    AmsterdamHofstadter 1994

  4. 1989
    Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg decided for the Church (S.D. Ind.). The court took judicial notice of van Rijn's reputation and his French forgery conviction.

    IndianapolisSullivan 1991Hoover 1990

  5. May–August 1989
    At the Indianapolis trial (late May 1989) Goldberg testified van Rijn told her Dikmen's credentials (official archaeologist of northern Cyprus), and that he dated the mosaics to the late fifth century; she had known of his French conviction; Kline brought out the $350,000 / $580,000 distribution through Fitzgerald. Judge Noland's order of 3 August 1989 awarded the mosaics to the Church of Cyprus; in the alternative he listed six warning signs under Swiss law, one that 'the middlemen were suspect'.

    IndianapolisHofstadter 1994

  6. August 1989
    By his own account to Hofstadter, left the Netherlands for Curacao in August 1989 after quarrels with Dikmen and with three former bodyguards (Marko, Draza, Hans) to whom he says he had sold shares in the Hand/Feet piece. Hofstadter was told by Amsterdam police that none of the three had ever been indicted.

    NetherlandsHofstadter 1994

  7. 1989
    NamedNamed as one of the dealers who brought Goldberg to the Kanakaria mosaics in the Indianapolis judgment. He was not a party. No conviction in Cyprus or elsewhere for a Cypriot antiquities offence is recorded in the sources read.

    Kaiser 1990Hofstadter 1994

  8. 1991–1992
    Met Hofstadter in The Hague over about a week (c. 1991-92): said Goldberg 'knew exactly what they were' and that he gave her a copy of the Dumbarton Oaks monograph (she denied seeing it until weeks after the purchase); described passing a Saint Peter icon, bought from Dikmen, via the restorer Stavros Mihalarias to the British Museum for 175,000 pounds (Mihalarias told Hofstadter he could not recall acquiring it from him), and a second Saint Peter that reached Dumbarton Oaks via a Dutch businessman; gave Hofstadter a manuscript autobiography describing his entry into the Cypriot icon trade and his 1970s first meeting with Dikmen in Munich. These are his own claims.

    The HagueHofstadter 1994

  9. 1992
    Escrow account, in his own words to Hofstadter: the Menil Foundation put the money for the Lysi frescoes into escrow for Dikmen; Petsopoulos told Dikmen the money was his whenever Cyprus and the Menil felt comfortable, in return for the mosaics, which Petsopoulos would hand to 'the right people'; Dikmen, 'crazy for money' over 'this one million dollars in his escrow account', was 'pressed' to deliver mosaics (Jude and Bartholomew, returned to Cyprus 1984) to Constantine Leventis but kept the 'good pieces' including the Feet of Christ. Van Rijn's account, not a finding.

    The HagueHofstadter 1994

  10. Undated
    Civil suitSued in Great Britain together with Fitzgerald over the ownership of a modello claimed to have been used by Michelangelo for the David (Sullivan, writing in 1991, calls it pending); separately sued by an art gallery for failure to pay (Hoover).

    Sullivan 1991Hoover 1990

  11. Undated
    NamedSavo (Dikmen's associate), as reported by Hofstadter, alleged van Rijn had a restaurant-owner friend impersonate Dikmen at Geneva airport and sent Dikmen a blank bill of sale; Fitzgerald repeated the impersonation claim; Savarona claimed the export licence was not Dikmen's. Van Rijn denied it 'most heatedly'. Allegations by interested parties, unproven.

    Hofstadter 1994

Connections

12 people

Sales, gifts & bequests

Disputes & the law

Colleagues & contacts

On Ancient Cyprus

1 page

Sources

  1. 1.Anne McC. Sullivan (1991). “Law and diplomacy in cultural property matters”. Museum Management and Curatorship 10, 219-243. Routledge. Online
  2. 2.Deborah Hoover (1990). “Museum Collections at Risk: Standards of Diligence for Protecting Your Monet”. Journal of Arts Management and Law 20, 37-62. Routledge. Online
  3. 3.Timothy Kaiser (1990). “The Antiquities Market”. Journal of Field Archaeology 17, 205-210. Online
  4. 4.Derek Fincham (2015). “The Rescue, Stewardship, and Return of the Lysi Frescoes by the Menil Foundation”. International Journal of Cultural Property. Online
  5. 5.Dan Hofstadter (1994). Goldberg's Angel: An Adventure in the Antiquities Trade.
  6. 6.Michel van Rijn (1993). Hot Art, Cold Cash. London, Little, Brown.
  7. 7.“Michel van Rijn (English Wikipedia)”. Online
  8. 8.Roger Pearse (2025). “Michel van Rijn (1950-2024)”. Roger Pearse weblog. Online
  9. 9.Annemarie Weyl Carr, Laurence J. Morrocco (1991). A Byzantine Masterpiece Recovered: The Thirteenth-Century Murals of Lysi, Cyprus. Austin, University of Texas Press, with the Menil Foundation.
  10. 10.Mark Rose (1998). “From Cyprus to Munich”. Archaeology (online), 20 April 1998. Archaeological Institute of America. Online