Lawyer / legislator
Thomas R. Kline
fl. 1989–1994 · United States
Washington lawyer who led the case for Cyprus and its Church against Peg Goldberg over the Kanakaria mosaics in Indianapolis in 1989 and won judgment on 3 August 1989.
Biography
Thomas Kline was chief attorney for the Republic of Cyprus and the Church of Cyprus in the Indianapolis suit over the Kanakaria mosaics. Dan Hofstadter describes him as of Manatt, Phelps, Rothenberg & Phillips in Washington, a lawyer who specialized in environmental and antitrust law; neither he nor Joe Emerson, counsel for the dealer Peg Goldberg, had tried an antiquities case1. Discovery took two months and more than twenty depositions. Kline's argument had two tiers: Indiana law gives no title from a thief, and under Swiss law Goldberg was not a good-faith purchaser1. He deposed Goldberg in April and May 19891.
At the trial in late May 1989, before Judge James E. Noland, Kline did not call Michel van Rijn, fearing sympathy for Goldberg1. He questioned Robert Fitzgerald about the $350,000 paid to Aydin Dikmen against Goldberg's price, which left roughly $650,000 unaccounted for, and he cross-examined Goldberg, a performance Hofstadter calls a disaster for her1. Judgment went to Cyprus on 3 August 1989; a motion to set it aside was denied and the Court of Appeals upheld the judgment1. Hofstadter later thanked Kline, then of Andrews & Kurth, for legal help with his book, and Kline told him that Dikmen was probably a constructed "identity"1.
Life and work
- 1989Chosen as Cyprus's chief attorney in the replevin suit over the Kanakaria mosaics against Peg Goldberg, with the Church of Cyprus as plaintiff; Hofstadter says he specialised in environmental and antitrust law and had never tried an antiquities case. Over a two-month discovery period more than twenty depositions were taken.
IndianapolisHofstadter 1994
- 1989Argued in the alternative: Indiana law (no good title from a thief) or, if Swiss law applied, that Goldberg was not a good-faith purchaser. Hofstadter reports he urged colleagues to assume there was no 'Aydin Dikmen' unless evidence showed otherwise.
IndianapolisHofstadter 1994
- April–May 1989Took Goldberg's deposition in Indianapolis.
IndianapolisHofstadter 1994
- May–June 1989At the trial before Judge James E. Noland, called Robert Fitzgerald on 2 June and asked whether Michel van Rijn paid Aydin Dikmen only $350,000, the figure in a middlemen's agreement produced by Ronald Faulk; later cross-examined Goldberg (the 'cross of Goldberg'), which Hofstadter calls an unqualified disaster for her. Hofstadter says Kline did not press complicity in the fencing of the mosaics, 'couldn't prove it and didn't need it'. Van Rijn was not called, because Kline felt his presence might elicit sympathy for her.
IndianapolisHofstadter 1994
- 3 August 1989Judge Noland ruled in favour of Cyprus (a year to the day before the motion to set aside judgment was filed on 3 Aug 1990, per Hofstadter); the Court of Appeals upheld the decision.
IndianapolisHofstadter 1994
- August–November 1990Hofstadter says Kline was 'more than a little worried' by Joe Emerson's 3 Aug 1990 motion to set aside judgment (based on Savo's statement); it was denied three months later.
IndianapolisHofstadter 1994
- 1992–1994Told Dan Hofstadter he suspected 'Dikmen' was a constructed identity (quoted by Hofstadter comparing him to an 'identity' in Le Carré), and said 'Maybe you're Dikmen'; Hofstadter calls him Cyprus's former attorney.
WashingtonHofstadter 1994
Connections
5 peopleDisputes & the law
- In litigation with Joe Emerson1989–1990
- In litigation with Peg Goldberg1989–1990
Scholarship
- Corresponded with Dan Hofstadter1992–1994
Colleagues & contacts
- Worked with Constantine Leventisprobably1989
- Worked with Gary Vikan1989
On Ancient Cyprus
1 pageSources
- 1.Dan Hofstadter (1994). Goldberg's Angel: An Adventure in the Antiquities Trade.