Research·Brief

Laser scans find 23 more possible ships carved on a Bronze Age temple at Kition

Nine of the 23 additions are rated certain; the authors argue ships were cut into Temple 1 for perhaps 300 years, from about 1200 BCE into the Early Iron Age.

Alexis Drakopoulos

By Alexis Drakopoulos

Published (Cyprus time)

Email IconLinkedIn Icon

Share

Twitter IconFacebook IconLinkedIn IconEmail Icon
A long wall of large weathered limestone slabs with faint carved marks, a scale bar at its foot and a grassy strip in front, with excavated stone foundations behind
Image: G.C. Braun, in Braun, Barnes and Manolova 2026, fig. 2, CC BY 4.0

Ships scratched into the stone of the Late Bronze Age temples at Kition, under modern Larnaca, are more numerous and were carved over a longer span than first thought, according to a study published online on 18 August 2026 in the International Journal of Nautical Archaeology. Graham C. Braun of the University of Cincinnati, Caroline Barnes of the University of British Columbia and Tzveta V. Manolova of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich recorded the carvings in 2024 and found 23 possible ships beyond the 19 already known on Temple 1.

The carvings and their first study

The graffiti are on two buildings in the sacred quarter at Kathari, which Vassos Karageorghis excavated for the Department of Antiquities. Most are on the orthostats (upright limestone slabs) of the outer south wall of Temple 1; two are on an altar in Temple 4. Lucien Basch and Michal Artzy published them in 1985, in an appendix to Excavations at Kition V, the report on the pre-Phoenician levels by Karageorghis and Martha Demas, and counted 19 ships on Temple 1.

Line drawing of the Temple 1 façade blocks in four rows, with small ship outlines numbered 1 to 19, four marks lettered A to D and rows of dots
The 1985 drawing of the Temple 1 ships, redrawn for the new paper.C. Barnes after V. Karageorghis, in Braun, Barnes and Manolova 2026, fig. 4

Already in 1985 Basch and Artzy found the Temple 1 ships too eroded to draw reliably, unlike those on the altar, which later floors had sealed. Both have stood in the open since. In 1998 Shelley Wachsmann noted that the worn lines allowed more than one reading and, given the Late Helladic IIIC pottery at the site, suggested Achaean ships [1, pp. 147–148].

What the scans show

In 2024 the team laser-scanned the seven Temple 1 orthostats that carry ships, together with block T1.8; the Temple 4 altar was modelled by photogrammetry. Mapping the depth and angle of each cut separated tool marks from weathering. Of the 23 additions, nine are rated certain, six probable and eight low confidence. Two marks that Basch and Artzy had flagged as possible ships proved on the scans to be damage.

Line drawing of the Temple 1 façade blocks T1.1 to T1.8 with every ship outline numbered and coloured black, blue or red, rows of dots, and stippled patches of damage
All the ship graffiti now recorded on the Temple 1 façade, by confidence: black certain, blue probable, red low. Numbers beginning 1982 follow the 1985 publication.G.C. Braun, in Braun, Barnes and Manolova 2026, fig. 6

At least eleven rows of small bored dots cross the façade, where the 1985 drawing had seven; often set just below the keels, they may stand for ripples or light on water, the authors suggest. The ships fall into six groups by shape, plus a few one-off forms; most are Levantine and Cypriot types, with a smaller set of Aegean vessels.

A repair block and the dating

The dating turns on block T1.8, a yellow sandstone repair by the south-east entrance of Temple 1 carrying at least one and possibly two ship graffiti. Following Demas, the authors place the repair in Floor I, dated by its pottery to Cypro-Geometric I–II, about a century and a half after the orthostats were raised; that stone was used at Kathari only after the end of the Late Bronze Age. The ships on it, they conclude, were probably not cut in the Bronze Age.

Drawing of a stone block with a row of dots, a ship with a mast outlined in black and a fainter hull below it in blue, above three false-colour scan images of the same surface labelled A to C
Block T1.8, the sandstone repair: the ship 2024.23 (certain) and the fainter 2024.22 (probable), with laser-scan analyses of the surface below.G.C. Braun, in Braun, Barnes and Manolova 2026, fig. 8

From this and from dated parallels for each ship type, the authors argue that the façade was carved continuously from about 1200 BCE into the Early Iron Age, perhaps for as long as 300 years, though they call stylistic dating coarse. On that reading the ships do not form the single procession that Basch and Artzy proposed. The Aegean types appear to have no parallels later than Late Cypriot IIIB, while Cypriot and Levantine ships run throughout; the authors read this as the work of a local community over generations, against Karageorghis's 1976 view of Kition as a Mycenaean foundation.

The authors leave open why the ships were carved, considering both votive images by seafarers, as Basch and Artzy thought, and silhouettes cut by people watching ships from the shore. The article's DOI is 10.1080/10572414.2026.2702905.

More in Research

All news in Research