Ancient CyprusAncient Cyprus

Late Bronze Age Cyprus

14 min read44 sourcesUpdated

Browse all 104 compendium entries from the Late Bronze Age →

Late Bronze Age sites

Small dots mark 24 more sites of the period.

Open the island map →

Contents

Of the many dynamic centers that constituted the interconnected world of the Late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean, the island of Cyprus holds a distinct position. Situated on the sea routes between the Aegean, Anatolia, the Levant, and Egypt, it emerged not as a peripheral recipient of culture, but as a major economic and political actor in its own right [1, p. 1; 2, p. 314]. This transformation was fueled by the island’s rich copper resources, the exploitation of which reshaped its society and secured its place in an international network of exchange [3, p. 24; 1, p. 1]. Understanding this period of profound change, however, depends on a chronological framework that is itself complex and subject to continuous scholarly debate [4, p. 660]. The chronology of Late Bronze Age Cyprus is not a simple sequence of dates but a narrative constructed from evolving pottery styles, contentious synchronisms with neighboring powers, and the subtle but significant shifts in settlement, industry, and ritual. The chronology of the Late Cypriot period runs from its turbulent beginnings around 1650 BCE to its transformative end around 1050 BCE, tracked through the material culture that defines each phase (Late Cypriot I, II, and III) and the key developments in social organization, trade, and technology that mark this critical era in the island's history.

The Foundations of Late Cypriot Chronology

Establishing a reliable timeline for Late Bronze Age Cyprus involves combining relative and absolute dating methods, each with its own set of challenges [5]. The relative chronology, which organizes material into sequential phases, is built almost entirely upon the seriation of pottery [6, p. 49]. The beginning of the Late Cypriot (LC) period is defined by the appearance of new, distinctive handmade wares (primarily White Slip, Base Ring, and Monochrome) that replaced the Red Polished pottery tradition of the preceding Middle Cypriot period [7, p. 572; 8, p. 10]. Subsequent subdivisions, such as LC IA-B, LC IIA-C, and LC IIIA-B, are likewise marked by changes in these ceramic repertoires, including the standardization of local wares and the appearance of imported pottery [7, p. 573]. The coastal settlement of Enkomi remains a key reference point, as it is the only site excavated to date with a continuous stratified sequence covering the entire Late Bronze Age [9, p. 1].

While pottery provides a robust relative sequence, assigning absolute dates in calendar years is more difficult [5]. Traditionally, absolute dates have been derived through correlations with the historically-anchored chronologies of Egypt and the Near East, based on Cypriot exports found in securely dated contexts abroad, or imports found on Cyprus [7, p. 573; 6, p. 51]. This method, however, can be circular and depends on the assumption that an object’s time of deposition is close to its time of manufacture [10, p. 228; 5]. More recently, scientific methods, particularly radiocarbon dating, have been employed to establish an independent absolute chronology [6, p. 51]. Radiocarbon dates for the LC IIC period (c. 1340–1200 BCE) have generally correlated well with traditional dates [7, p. 573; 5]. However, for the Middle to Late Bronze Age transition, radiocarbon evidence has prompted debates over a "high" or "low" chronology, particularly concerning the date of the volcanic eruption on Thera and its synchronism with Cypriot and Aegean sequences [11, p. 125]. There are currently no absolute dates for the MC III–LC IIB periods [5]. This chronological uncertainty, combined with significant regional variation in the adoption of new pottery styles across the island, complicates efforts to create a single, unified timeline [5; 6, p. 50].

Late Cypriot I

Late Cypriot I (LC I) is the first phase of the Late Bronze Age, conventionally dated c. 1650–1450 BCE and divided into LC IA and LC IB. The scheme in general use is Paul Åström's, which further splits LC IA into IA1 and IA2. It rests on the sequence of local pottery, on the fit between Cypriot wares and the Helladic sequence of the Aegean, and to some extent on historical events; its absolute dates come from synchronisms with Egypt and the Aegean rather than from radiocarbon, which carries a risk of circular argument [46, p. 216]. Peter Fischer has proposed a start in the second half of the 17th century BCE, against the conventional 1600 BCE [46, p. 216].

An LC I deposit is recognised by its handmade wares. In Åström's terms, Proto White Slip and probably Proto Base Ring appear in LC IA1, while White Slip I and Base Ring I do not appear before LC IA2. In LC IB mature White Slip I was produced and exported to Egypt and the Levant, and White Slip II seems to begin at the very end of the phase [46, p. 216]. At Hala Sultan Tekke the oldest locally made material in Area A belongs to LC IA, including Proto White Slip found with White Slip I and Base Ring I in an offering pit [46]. Typical LC I shapes in the catalogue are Base Ring jugs and juglets, among them a Base Ring double bil-bil, and hollow figural vessels such as a rattle in the form of an owl, both in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. See all Late Cypriot I objects in the catalogue.

The transition from the Middle Cypriot (MC) III to the Late Cypriot I (LC I) period was a time of significant social disruption and reorganization [1, p. 2; 12, p. 80]. The archaeological record indicates a period of instability, with the abandonment of many MC settlements and the construction of fortresses along the Karpass Peninsula and the slopes of the Kyrenia and Troodos mountain ranges [1, p. 2]. Mass burials found at sites like Pendayia Mandres have been interpreted as possible evidence of warfare or epidemic, though osteological evidence has not confirmed this [1, p. 2]. These developments suggest a period of population stress and competition, perhaps driven by emergent elites vying for control of resources [1, p. 2; 13, p. 97].

This societal shift is mirrored in the material culture that defines the beginning of the Late Bronze Age. The LC IA period (c. 1650–1550 BCE) is marked by the introduction of formative stages of the new handmade wares, known as Proto-White Slip (PWS) and Proto-Base Ring (PBR) [14, p. 119; 15, p. 22]. These wares, considered chronological markers for the start of the era, first appeared in the Morphou Bay area in the west of the island [6, p. 50]. This regionalism is a key feature of the LC I period. While the west developed and adopted handmade wares like White Slip and Base Ring, eastern Cyprus saw the introduction of wheelmade pottery, including Plain White Wheelmade and Bichrome Wheelmade wares [6, p. 50]. The adoption of these different ceramic traditions occurred at different times across the island, making it difficult to recognize contemporaneous assemblages [5]. For instance, PWS appears later in eastern Cyprus than it does in the west, and may even appear in Egyptian contexts earlier than it does in the east of the island [6, p. 50]. Handmade painted pottery of the period includes a White Painted VI rattle in the Drakopoulos collection, dated LC I–II (c. 1650–1300 BCE): a hollow bird with an owl-like head, two pierced eyes and broad dark stripes hanging down its cream-slipped body.

White Painted VI owl-headed rattle, Late Cypriot I–II, c. 1650–1300 BCE, Alexis Drakopoulos Collection
White Painted VI owl-headed rattle, Late Cypriot I–II, c. 1650–1300 BCE, Alexis Drakopoulos Collection

Economically, the LC I period laid the groundwork for the island's future prosperity. Copper production intensified, and Cyprus began to integrate more fully into the Eastern Mediterranean trade networks [16, p. 19; 12, p. 80]. This process was likely a key factor in the rise of urban centers and the establishment of coastal towns favorably situated for long-distance trade [17, p. 154]. Initially, it appears that Enkomi, on the southeast coast, controlled the island's copper industry and served as its primary seat of power [18, p. 91]. The succeeding LC IB period (c. 1550–1450 BCE) saw these trends continue, setting the stage for the full flowering of Cypriot urban society in the subsequent century [7, p. 573].

Late Cypriot II

Late Cypriot II (LC II) runs from c. 1450 to 1200 BCE and is divided into LC IIA, IIB and IIC. Åström tied the first two closely to the Mycenaean sequence: LC IIA1 to Late Helladic IIIA1, LC IIA2 to LH IIIA2a and LC IIB to LH IIIA2b, with White Slip II, Base Ring II and Plain White Wheelmade II as the characteristic local wares [46, p. 216]. Fischer doubts that the Helladic link is so tight, and points out that White Slip II and Base Ring II were made over a long span, which limits their precision as dating tools [46, p. 216]. LC IIC, defined by Åström and later refined by Barbara Kling, corresponds to LH IIIB. Proposed dates for it have ranged from 1320–1190 BCE to 1300–1200 BCE; radiocarbon places it from c. 1340–1315 to c. 1200 BCE, in broad agreement with the conventional chronology [45, pp. 328–329].

In practice an LC II group is recognised by White Slip II bowls, Base Ring II jugs and juglets, often with added white paint, and by imported or locally made Mycenaean pottery of LH IIIA–IIIB. Base Ring figurines and zoomorphic vessels belong here too. Catalogue examples include a Base Ring II jug with white-painted lattice bands in the Drakopoulos collection and a statuette of a woman with a bird face in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. See all Late Cypriot II objects in the catalogue.

The Late Cypriot II period marks the apex of the island’s Bronze Age prosperity and international engagement. During these centuries, Cypriot society became fully urbanized, socially stratified, and deeply connected to the major powers of the Eastern Mediterranean [19, p. 154; 17, p. 154]. This era of stability and growth is archaeologically visible through the development of large urban centers along the coast, such as Enkomi, Hala Sultan Tekke, Kition, and Maroni [7, p. 573; 1, p. 2]. These towns featured monumental architecture, including administrative buildings and temples constructed with ashlar masonry, signaling the presence of centralized political authority [20, p. 56; 21, p. 91].

The economic engine driving this urban expansion was the copper industry [20, p. 56; 1, p. 1]. The production and export of copper became more intensive and widespread, making Cyprus the key supplier of this essential metal throughout the Mediterranean [19, p. 154; 22, p. 5]. This trade is evidenced by the discovery of Cypriot copper oxhide ingots as far west as Marseille and as far north as Germany [3, p. 23]. In turn, Cyprus received a significant volume of foreign goods. While contacts with Crete and the Aegean existed in earlier periods, they intensified dramatically during LC II [24, p. 120]. The importation of Mycenaean pottery, in particular, reached a peak in the 14th and 13th centuries BCE (LH IIIA2-IIIB), with a flood of ceramics arriving on the island [24, p. 169].

The chronology of the LC II period is divided into three main phases based on developments in the ceramic record: LC IIA (c. 1450–1375 BCE), LC IIB (c. 1375–1300 BCE), and LC IIC (c. 1300–1200 BCE) [7, p. 573]. These phases are characterized by the standardization of the hallmark Cypriot wares, White Slip and Base Ring, and by the evolving styles of imported Mycenaean pottery [7, p. 573]. The widespread circulation of these distinctive ceramics throughout the Eastern Mediterranean makes them excellent chronological indices [10, p. 74]. The LC IIC period, corresponding roughly to the 13th century BCE, represents the final stage of this prosperous era, a time of peak urbanism and trade just before the widespread disruptions that would transform the region [24, p. 399]. It was also during LC II that writing became more established on the island [19, p. 154]. The undeciphered Cypro-Minoan script, which first appeared in LC I, is attested on clay tablets, cylinders, and other objects, indicating the development of administrative practices needed to manage a complex economy [19, p. 154; 26, p. 2].

White Slip II hemispherical bowl with wishbone handle, Late Cypriot II, Alexis Drakopoulos Collection
White Slip II hemispherical bowl with wishbone handle, Late Cypriot II, Alexis Drakopoulos Collection

White Slip and Base Ring are both represented in the Drakopoulos collection by a White Slip II hemispherical bowl with a wishbone handle, a Base Ring bilbil juglet with a funnel mouth and a Base Ring II double juglet. A three-handled jar in the Mycenaean style in the same collection was made in Cyprus in LC IIA–IIB (c. 1375–1300 BCE) and carries a frieze of linked spirals between its handles. Finds abroad show the same shapes in circulation. The Penn Museum holds a fragment of a white-slipped milk-bowl wishbone handle from its excavations at Beth Shean, and the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in Leiden a Base Ring I double juglet, ZM 55, dated LC I and recorded as from Egypt. The Ashmolean Museum's Base Ring jug AN1953.297 is a larger Base Ring jug, 26.5 cm tall.

Late Cypriot III

Late Cypriot III (LC III) covers c. 1200–1050 BCE, divided into LC IIIA (c. 1200–1125/1100 BCE) and LC IIIB (c. 1125/1100–1050 BCE). Maria Iacovou regards the start of LC IIIA around 1200 BCE as fairly secure on the radiocarbon evidence, but its end around 1125/1100, and so the start of LC IIIB, as unsubstantiated [47, p. 662]. Not every scheme draws the line in the same place: Voskos and Knapp group late LC IIC with LC IIIA as one phase, c. 1250–1125 BCE [4]. Iacovou treats LC IIIA as the last phase of the island's Late Bronze Age culture, found mainly at sites already occupied in LC IIC, and LC IIIB as increasingly recognised as the first phase of the Early Iron Age [47].

The phase is recognised mainly by its painted wheelmade pottery. LC IIIA is dominated by a wheelmade matt-painted ware that has been published under several names: Mycenaean IIIC:1b, Late Mycenaean IIIB, Rude Style, Decorated LC III and Levanto-Helladic [4]. Rude Style bell kraters occur in Level IIIA at Enkomi [4]. In LC IIIB Proto-White Painted becomes the predominant fine ware, a clear break with the earlier tradition [4]. Kraters, stirrup jars and bird-shaped askoi are typical shapes; the catalogue has a krater and a stirrup jar of this phase, both in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. See all Late Cypriot III objects in the catalogue.

The transition from the 13th to the 12th century BCE was a period of profound crisis across the Eastern Mediterranean, marked by the collapse of the Hittite Empire, the decline of Mycenaean palatial centers, and the disruption of long-distance trade networks [27, p. 41; 28, p. 9]. Cyprus was not immune to these events, and the end of the LC IIC and the beginning of the LC IIIA period (c. 1200 BCE) was a time of dramatic and often violent change on the island [4, p. 660]. The archaeological record reveals a horizon of destruction and abandonment at major urban centers. Sites like Kalavasos-Ayios Dhimitrios and Maroni-Vournes were deserted, while others, including Enkomi and Sinda, show evidence of destruction by fire [21, p. 91; 29, p. 14; 30, p. 14]. Simultaneously, new, heavily fortified settlements were founded at defensible locations such as Maa-Palaeokastro and Pyla-Kokkinokremos, suggesting a response to widespread insecurity [31, p. 90; 32, p. 120].

The causes of this upheaval are intensely debated. Some scholars point to environmental factors, citing paleoenvironmental data that suggest a shift toward more arid conditions in the region around 1200 BCE, which could have led to agricultural failure and famine [27, p. 41; 33, p. 16; 34, p. 119]. Others emphasize the role of human action, often linking the destruction to the movements of the so-called "Sea Peoples" mentioned in Egyptian texts [35, p. 14]. This model suggests the arrival of new populations, possibly from the Aegean, who either violently settled on the island or contributed to the instability that led to the collapse of the old order [36, p. 5; 35, p. 14]. However, the archaeological evidence for a large-scale, destructive migration is ambiguous, and many of the changes can also be interpreted as resulting from internal social and political conflicts [37, p. 4; 30, p. 14]. It is likely that a combination of environmental stress, internal strife, and the disruption of external trade networks contributed to the transformation of Cypriot society [34, p. 121].

This period of transformation is clearly marked in the material culture, providing a key chronological distinction. The LC IIIA period (c. 1200–1125/1100 BCE) is defined by the gradual disappearance of the traditional Late Cypriot tableware like White Slip and Base Ring wares and a marked increase in the local production of Mycenaean-style pottery, known as White Painted Wheelmade III [7, p. 573; 38, p. 35]. This shift from handmade local traditions to wheelmade Aegean styles represents a fundamental change in the island's ceramic industry [39, p. 85]. Mortuary practices also changed, with a move away from the long-standing use of multi-generational chamber tombs toward burial in simpler, single-use shaft graves within settlements [40, p. 8; 41, p. 11].

The final phase of the Bronze Age, LC IIIB (c. 1125/1100–1050 BCE), marks the transition to the Iron Age [41, p. 11; 42, p. 814]. This period is characterized by another major shift in pottery production with the introduction of Proto-White Painted ware, a standardized style that combines local Cypriot, Aegean, and Levantine traditions and is the direct ancestor of the Iron Age ceramic industry [4, p. 673]. The settlement pattern changed again, with the abandonment of the last remaining Late Bronze Age centers and the gradual establishment of the new polities that would become the city-kingdoms of the Iron Age [42, p. 814; 40, p. 8]. Burial customs were also transformed, with a reversion to extramural cemeteries and the adoption of new tomb types that have parallels with Mycenaean tombs in mainland Greece [41, p. 11; 42, p. 814]. This final phase was not an ending, but a period of reconfiguration that laid the social and political foundations for the next chapter of Cypriot history.

Conclusion

The chronology of the Late Bronze Age on Cyprus charts a course of dramatic societal change. Over six centuries, the island transformed from a collection of rural communities into a network of sophisticated urban polities that were central to the economic life of the Eastern Mediterranean. This trajectory, from the initial upheavals of LC I, through the prosperous internationalism of LC II, to the crisis and reorganization of LC III, is documented primarily through the island's rich ceramic record. The introduction, evolution, and eventual disappearance of wares like White Slip and Base Ring, alongside the influx and local imitation of Mycenaean pottery, provide the essential framework for dividing this long era into manageable, if sometimes contentious, phases.

The study of this period reveals the inherent complexities of archaeological chronology. The reliance on pottery creates a system that can be challenged by regional diversity and the fluid nature of transitional periods. Absolute dating, whether through historical synchronisms or scientific methods, remains subject to debate and refinement. Yet, despite these challenges, the chronological sequence provides a powerful narrative. It shows a society that successfully exploited its primary natural resource, copper, to engage with and influence the wider world. It also documents the island's resilience; the collapse at the end of the 13th century BCE was not a terminal event but a catalyst for profound transformation, leading to the emergence of the new cultural and political configurations of the Iron Age. Many questions remain. The precise nature and timing of the "crisis" are still debated, and the relationship between the undeciphered Cypro-Minoan script of the Bronze Age and the Cypriot Syllabary of the Iron Age is not fully understood [44, p. 37; 34, p. 121]. Continued research into the regional variations of material culture and further refinement of absolute dating methods will undoubtedly add new layers to our understanding of this era in Cypriot history.

Objects on this page

In the catalogue

Late Cypriot (Late Bronze Age) Period

  • Bronze rod tripod, Late Bronze Age III Cypriot tool
  • Gold roundel of bulbous form, Late Bronze Age II Cypriot jewelry
  • Basalt tripod vessel or mortar, Bronze Age Cypriot tool
  • Silver spiral, Late Bronze Age II Cypriot jewelry
  • Gold spiral, Late Bronze Age II Cypriot jewelry
  • Basalt mortar or plate, Late Bronze Age II Cypriot dish

See all 1,153 objects →

References

  1. 1.Steel, L. (2013). Cyprus during the Late Bronze Age. In The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000–332 BCE (pp. 571–585).
  2. 2.Knapp, A. B., & Meyer, N. (2023). Merchants and mercantile society on Late Bronze Age Cyprus. American Journal of Archaeology, 127(3), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1086/724597
  3. 3.Iacovou, M. (Ed.). (2012). Cyprus and the Aegean in the Early Iron Age: The legacy of Nicolas Coldstream. Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation.
  4. 4.Voskos, I., & Knapp, A. B. (2008). Cyprus at the end of the Late Bronze Age: Crisis and colonization or continuity and hybridization? American Journal of Archaeology, 112(4), 659–684.
  5. 5.Crewe, L. (2007). Early Enkomi: Regionalism, trade and society at the beginning of the Late Bronze Age on Cyprus. BAR Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407301501
  6. 6.Horowitz, M. T. (2007). *Monumentality and social transformation at Late Bronze I Phlamoudhi-Vounari, Cyprus* [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University].
  7. 7.Steel, L. (2013). Cyprus during the Late Bronze Age. In The archaeological record (pp. 571–). Oxford University Press.
  8. 8.Steel, L. (2010). Late Cypriot ceramic production: Heterarchy or hierarchy? In D. Bolger & L. C. Maguire (Eds.), Development of pre-state communities in the ancient Near East (pp. 106–?). Oxbow Books.
  9. 9.Crewe, L. (2003). Contextualising the Lustrous Wares at Enkomi: Settlement and Mortuary Deposition During Late Cypriot I–IIB. In V. Karageorghis & N. Chr. Stampolidis (Eds.), Sea Routes ... From Sidon to Huelva: Interconnections in the Mediterranean 16th – 6th c. B.C. Proceedings of an International Symposium held at Rethymnon, Crete, September 29th–30th 2002 (pp. 65-75). A.G. Leventis Foundation.
  10. 10.Maguire, L. C. (1990). The circulation of Cypriot pottery in the Middle Bronze Age [Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh].
  11. 11.Bietak, M., & Czerny, E. (Eds.). (2007). The synchronisation of civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the second millennium B.C. III (Contributions to the chronology of the Eastern Mediterranean, Vol. 9). Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  12. 12.Jeffra, C. D. (2011). The archaeological study of innovation: An experimental approach to the pottery wheel in Bronze Age Crete and Cyprus [Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter].
  13. 13.Knox, D.-K. (2012). *Making sense of figurines in Bronze Age Cyprus: A comprehensive analysis of Cypriot ceramic figurative material from EC I – LC IIIA (c.2300BC – c.1100BC)* [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester].
  14. 14.Bürge, T., & Recht, L. (Eds.). (2024). T. Bürge & L. Recht (Eds.), Dynamics and developments of social structures and networks in prehistoric and protohistoric Cyprus. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320203
  15. 15.Caloi, I., & Langohr, C. (Eds.). (2018). Technology in Crisis: Technological changes in ceramic production during periods of trouble. Presses universitaires de Louvain.
  16. 16.Cadogan, G., Iacovou, M., Kopaka, K., & Whitley, J. (Eds.). (2012). Parallel lives: Ancient island societies in Crete and Cyprus. The British School at Athens.
  17. 17.Keswani, P. (2005). Mortuary ritual and society in Bronze Age Cyprus. Equinox Publishing.
  18. 18.Goren, Y., Finkelstein, I., & Na’aman, N. (2004). Inscribed in clay: Provenance study of the Amarna tablets and other ancient Near Eastern texts. Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University.
  19. 19.Knapp, A. B. (2008). Prehistoric and protohistoric Cyprus: Identity, insularity, and connectivity. Oxford University Press.
  20. 20.Graham, L. (2013). The Necropolis of Kissonerga-Ammoudhia: Techniques of Ceramic Production in Early-Middle Bronze Age Western Cyprus [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Edinburgh].
  21. 21.Artzy, M. (2006). The Jatt metal hoard in Northern Canaanite/Phoenician and Cypriote context. (Cuadernos de Arqueología Mediterránea, Vol. 14). Edicions Bellaterra.
  22. 22.Orphanides, A. G. (2017). Late Bronze Age Socio-Economic and Political Organization, and the Hellenization of Cyprus. Athens Journal of History, 3(1), 7-10.
  23. 24.Graziadio, G. (2025). The Aegean and Cyprus: Interaction Between Two Distinct Cultural Mediterranean Areas from the Third Millennium to Ca 1200 BC. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari – Venice University Press. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-857-6
  24. 26.Smith, J. S., & Hirschfeld, N. E. (1999). The Cypro-Minoan Corpus Project Takes an Archaeological Approach. Near Eastern Archaeology, 62(2), 129-130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210706
  25. 27.Fischer, P. M., & Bürge, T. (2017). The New Swedish Cyprus Expedition 2016: Excavations at Hala Sultan Tekke (The Söderberg Expedition). Preliminary results. Opuscula, 10, 50-93.
  26. 28.Pilides, D., & Papadimitriou, N. (Eds.). (2012). Ancient Cyprus: Cultures in dialogue. Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.
  27. 29.Bürge, T., & Fischer, P. M. (Eds.). (2023). The decline of Bronze Age civilisations in the Mediterranean: Cyprus and beyond (Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Vol. 154). Astrom Editions.
  28. 30.Iacovou, M. (n.d.). The political landscape of pre-Ptolemaic Cyprus: Cycles of devolution and territorialization.
  29. 31.Jazwa, K. A. (2021). Insular architecture and settlement planning during a crisis: The case of Maa-Palaeokastro (Cyprus). In L. Dierksmeier, F. Schön, A. Kouremenos, A. Condit, & V. Palmowski (Eds.), European islands between isolated and interconnected life worlds: Interdisciplinary long-term perspectives (pp. 89–112). Tübingen University Press. https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-62813
  30. 32.Bourogiannis, G. (Ed.). (2022). Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Classical Period (AURA Supplement 9). Faculty of History and Archaeology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
  31. 33.Meyer, N., & Knapp, A. B. (2021). Resilient Social Actors in the Transition from the Late Bronze to the Early Iron Age on Cyprus. Journal of World Prehistory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-021-09163-7
  32. 34.Kearns, C. (2023). The rural landscapes of Archaic Cyprus: An archaeology of environmental and social change. Cambridge University Press.
  33. 35.Fisher, K. D. (2018). Cyprus, Archaeology of. In C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_939-2
  34. 36.Middleton, G. D. (2015). Telling Stories: The Mycenaean Origins of the Philistines. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34(1), 45–65.
  35. 37.Hitchcock, M. (n.d.). The Mycenaean Presence on Cyprus at the End of the Bronze Age: Migration, Acculturation, or Hybridization?
  36. 38.Papasavvas, G. (2004). Cypriot bronze stands and their Mediterranean perspective. Revista d'Arqueologia de Ponent, 14, 31–59.
  37. 39.Georgiou, A. (Ed.). (2012). Cyprus: An island culture: Society and social relations from the Bronze Age to the Venetian period. Oxbow Books.
  38. 40.Iacovou, M. (2008). Cultural and Political Configurations in Iron Age Cyprus: The Sequel to a Protohistoric Episode. American Journal of Archaeology, 112(4), 625-657. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20627513
  39. 41.Steel, L. (2009). Cyprus.
  40. 42.Cline, E. H. (Ed.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of the Bronze Age Aegean. Oxford University Press.
  41. 44.Steele, P. M. (2013). A linguistic history of ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c. 1600–300 BC. Cambridge University Press.
  42. 45.Manning, S. W., Weninger, B., South, A. K., Kling, B., Kuniholm, P. I., Muhly, J. D., Hadjisavvas, S., Sewell, D. A., & Cadogan, G. (2001). Absolute age range of the Late Cypriot IIC period on Cyprus. Antiquity, 75, 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00060981
  43. 46.Fischer, P. M. (2019). The occupational history of the Bronze Age harbour city of Hala Sultan Tekke, Cyprus. Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 29, 188–229.
  44. 47.Iacovou, M. (2013). Cyprus during the Iron Age I period (Late Cypriot IIC–IIIA): Settlement pattern crisis (LC IIC–IIIA) to the restructuring (LC IIIB) of its settlement pattern. In A. E. Killebrew & M. Steiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000–332 BCE. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199212972.013.043