Base Ring Bull Vessels

Base Ring Bull Vessels

The Bull in the Base Ring: Production, Function, and Meaning of a Late Bronze Age Cypriot Vessel

In the cosmopolitan world of the Late Bronze Age eastern Mediterranean, Cypriot pottery was a ubiquitous feature of international exchange networks [1, p. 209; 2, p. 211]. From the Levant to Egypt and the Aegean, distinctive Cypriot wares circulated widely, serving as containers for valuable commodities and as desirable objects in their own right [3, p. 13]. Among the most recognizable of these exports was Base Ring ware, a category of hand-built, hard-fired pottery with a characteristic metallic finish, often with a lustrous red or dark brown to black slip intended to mimic the appearance of copper [4, p. 48; 5, p. 4]. While the most common forms were jugs, juglets, and bowls, Cypriot potters also produced a more specialized and visually striking vessel: the Base Ring bull.

These zoomorphic containers, which appeared in the Late Cypriot IIA period (c. 1450 BCE), combine functional vessel attributes with the potent symbolism of the bull [5, p. 6; 6, p. 303]. With a hollow, cylindrical body standing on four legs, a handle on the back, a filling aperture on the shoulder, and a spout for pouring through the nostrils, the bull vessel is a hybrid of sculpture and ceramic technology [5, p. 6]. Its production required significant technical skill, its distribution spanned the Near East, and its depositional contexts range from tombs to industrial workshops and sanctuaries [7, p. 227; 6, p. 174]. The object raises fundamental questions about craft specialization, trade mechanics, and the intersection of ritual and daily life in Late Bronze Age Cyprus.

This article examines the Base Ring bull vessel as a material phenomenon. It will investigate the highly specific manufacturing process and the scientific evidence for its production origins, which points to a localized industry with an island-wide reach. It will then trace the vessel’s distribution and analyze its varied find contexts, exploring its role in funerary practice, settlement life, and ritual performance. Finally, it will address the complex and often-debated issues of the vessel's function, its possible contents, and its deep-seated symbolic meaning within Cypriot society and beyond.

The Craft of the Bull: Production and Provenance

The creation of Base Ring bull vessels was an extension of the broader Base Ring ware tradition, a ceramic class that demonstrates a high degree of technical mastery [5, p. 6; 8, p. 23]. The ware is defined by its thin, hard-fired walls, achieved through firing at high temperatures, sometimes in a double-firing process [5, p. 4; 9, p. 14]. This technique demanded a very specific raw material: a highly plastic, non-calcareous sedimentary clay rich in fine mica [10, p. 280]. This clay lacked the tensile strength for wheel-throwing, meaning that all Base Ring vessels, including the bulls, were hand-built [5, p. 4; 8, p. 23]. Potters shaped the vessels without the use of Rotative Kinetic Energy, though they may have used turntables for finishing procedures like scraping, smoothing, or fashioning the base and rim [8, p. 23; 11, p. 13]. Fingerprints are sometimes visible on the interior of closed vessels, a direct trace of the forming process [8, p. 23].

The manufacture of the bull form itself was complex. The body is typically cylindrical, standing on four short legs, with a modeled tail and a handle attached to the back [5, p. 6]. The heads are realistically rendered with applied pellet eyes, modeled ears, and prominent horns that curve upward and inward [5, p. 6; 6, p. 311]. A filling hole is located on the back, in front of the handle, and an aperture in the snout allows for pouring [5, p. 6]. While the general form is consistent, there is variation in size, with recorded examples ranging from 10.5 cm to 25 cm in length [6, p. 311]. Some examples feature white painted lines, a decorative treatment typical of the Base Ring II phase, while others are undecorated [12, p. 34; 6, p. 169]. The relative scarcity of these objects—one study catalogued 214 definite examples over a 300-year period—suggests they were not mass-produced in the modern sense [6, p. 187]. Rather, the existence of small groups of nearly identical vessels found at distant sites indicates they were made in small batches by skilled artisans and distributed through an integrated, island-wide network [6, p. 187].

The question of where these specialized potters sourced their unique clay has been a subject of considerable scientific investigation and debate. Early petrographic and chemical analyses by L. Courtois suggested that the raw material was homogeneous and pointed to potential clay sources in the Kyrenia range in the north and in the southwest of Cyprus, between Palaepaphos and the Akamas peninsula [13, p. 280; 10, p. 280; 14, p. 526]. Subsequent research by S. Vaughan, also using petrography, expanded the list of possible source regions to include the Kythrea Flysch in the north, the Pakhna Formation on the southern coast, and the Mamonia Terrane in the southwest, proposing that multiple production centers existed across the island [14, p. 526].

This model of dispersed production has been challenged by more recent, high-precision analytical techniques. A study using lead isotopic analysis on seven Base Ring sherds found that their isotopic signatures were not compatible with clay sources from the Kythrea, Moni, Kannaviou, or Pakhna formations, nor from the Mamonia Terrane [14, p. 526]. Instead, all seven samples matched the lead isotope signature of a single clay source: the Kathikas Formation, located along the Diarizos valley in southwest Cyprus [14, p. 526]. While this analysis was conducted on a limited sample set, it strongly suggests that a single, specific clay deposit was the primary source for at least one major production group of Base Ring ware. This finding implies a more centralized or localized production system than previously thought, where specialist potters either lived near this unique resource or traveled to procure it, before distributing their finished products across the island and overseas. The very homogeneity of the ware, which required such specific materials and advanced skills, points toward production by specialist craftsmen operating in a limited number of regional centers, supported by an extensive distribution network [8, p. 23].

An Object in Motion: Distribution and Context

The distribution of Base Ring bull vessels reflects their integration into the broad exchange systems of the Late Bronze Age. On Cyprus itself, they have been found in a variety of contexts, including tombs, settlements, and sanctuaries [7, p. 227]. Beyond the island, they were exported to the Levant, where they appear at sites like Tel Batash, and to the Aegean, with an example recovered from a tomb at Ialysos on Rhodes [15, p. 168; 16, p. 4; 17, p. 145]. This wide dispersal suggests the vessel held a recognized value, although its meaning and use likely varied depending on the cultural context in which it was received. The findspots provide the primary evidence for interpreting the vessel's role in Late Bronze Age society.

The Mortuary Sphere

By far the most common context for Base Ring bull vessels is funerary [18, p. 182; 19, p. 47]. During the Late Cypriot II and IIIa periods, they were the most popular type of figural imagery deposited in tombs, outnumbering other common forms like female figurines [6, p. 183]. The discovery of matching pairs of bull vessels in at least two tombs raises the possibility that they were sometimes used in twos as part of the mortuary ritual [6, p. 183]. In the Levant, where they were also exported, they are more typical of funerary contexts than settlement deposits [15, p. 172]. This consistent association with burial suggests the vessel, and perhaps its contents, played a role in the ceremonies accompanying death or was considered an important provision for the afterlife.

The Settlement Sphere

In contrast to the deliberate placements in tombs, the evidence from settlements presents a more varied picture. Many examples from settlement sites have been found in layers of fill or construction debris [6, p. 174]. This suggests that after a period of use, they were discarded without special treatment, much like ordinary domestic pottery [6, p. 174]. Wear patterns, particularly on the handles of many examples, indicate they were subject to frequent, practical handling before being deposited [6, p. 172].

However, some settlement finds point to more specific functions. An intriguing pattern has emerged of bull vessels being found in areas associated with industry and craft production [6, p. 174; 20, p. 9]. At Kition, a fragmentary bull vessel was found in a room that appears to have housed a furnace for processing copper [6, p. 174]. A Base Ring bull figurine (a non-functional counterpart to the vessel) was found in a storage room at Kourion-Bamboula alongside other figurines, while another was discovered in a building at Kalavasos-Ayios Dhimitrios near a pithos and grinding stones [6, p. 174]. At Tel Batash in the Levant, a bull rhyton was part of an assemblage in a large building that also contained other "prized possessions," including Mycenaean pottery, suggesting its owner was of a high socioeconomic status [15, p. 204]. This association with crafting, industry, and elite households complicates a purely ritual or funerary interpretation and suggests the vessel was embedded in the economic and social life of these communities.

The Ritual Sphere

While less common than in tombs, Base Ring bulls do appear in contexts that are unequivocally ritual. Fragments have been identified in the Central Cult House at Ayia Irini and the Cult House at Idalion [6, p. 174]. Perhaps the most dramatic example comes from Hala Sultan Tekke, where a virtually complete bull vessel was discovered deep inside a well [21, p. 29; 22, p. 54]. The excavators argue that it was deposited there deliberately, not dropped by accident, and consider it an offering [21, p. 29]. The vessel from this well is unusual: it lacks the typical white-painted decoration of Base Ring II and has three irregular holes in its belly, made before firing, which may be related to the offering ceremony [21, p. 29]. This find provides clear evidence for the vessel's use in formal ritual practice, separate from its funerary role. The bull's presence across these three spheres—mortuary, domestic/industrial, and formal ritual—demonstrates its versatility and its ability to function within multiple aspects of Late Cypriot life.

Contents and Use

Given that the bull is a hollow container with a filling hole and a pouring spout, its primary function was to hold and dispense a liquid [5, p. 6]. The fine spout in the snout would have allowed for slow, controlled pouring, a feature suitable for dispensing valuable substances or for use in libations [19, p. 47; 23, p. 3]. The identity of this liquid has been the subject of one of the most persistent debates in Cypriot archaeology, centered on the broader Base Ring ware category.

The most famous theory, proposed by Robert Merrillees, is that Base Ring juglets were containers for opium [24, p. 15]. He argued that the shape of the juglets deliberately mimics an inverted, incised poppy seed head, non-verbally advertising its psychoactive contents [25, p. 4; 4, p. 48]. This hypothesis has spurred decades of scientific research, primarily through residue analysis, with conflicting results.

Early claims for opium content were often based on unverified or methodologically weak analyses [25, p. 4]. A 1996 study by Koschel presented the first viable evidence for opium in a Base Ring juglet, though its provenance was unknown [25, p. 4]. More recently, a robust 2018 analysis of a sealed juglet in the British Museum detected two opium alkaloids, papaverine and thebaine [26, p. 11]. However, this same analysis found that the residue was primarily composed of degraded plant oil, raising questions about whether the vessel held opium-infused oil, or whether it had been reused [26, p. 11]. Against these few positive results, numerous other analyses of Base Ring jugs and juglets from secure contexts in Cyprus and the Levant have failed to find any trace of opium [27, p. 11; 25, p. 11]. Instead, these studies have identified aromatic oils, which could have been used for medicinal or anointing purposes, as well as traces of fats and waxes [27, p. 11; 28, p. 62].

The evidence remains inconclusive. The possibility of reuse complicates any definitive conclusion; a vessel could have originally held a common substance like scented oil and later been used for a rarer one like an opium solution, or vice versa [25, p. 11]. It is plausible that Base Ring vessels carried a variety of precious liquids, and that opium was only one among several, perhaps accounting for its rare detection [28, p. 62].

Beyond the chemical contents, the social function of the bull vessel seems to have been tied to practices of communal consumption and display. Scholars have suggested they were used in feasting or commensal drinking practices, where "precious liquids" were poured and consumed [6, p. 215; 20, p. 9]. In these settings, the vessel would have served as an "attention focusing device," its zoomorphic form adding a theatrical or symbolic element to the event [20, p. 9]. It could have been used to pour libations to a deity or to serve a special beverage to human participants. The use of Base Ring carinated cups as the preferred drinking vessel in Cyprus, even in sanctuaries, supports the idea of a culturally specific drinking set in which the bull vessel could have played a key serving role [9, p. 14; 29, p. 13].

The Power of the Bull: Symbolism and Legacy

The choice of the bull was not arbitrary. The animal carried immense symbolic weight throughout the ancient Near East and Mediterranean. Since the Neolithic, bull imagery has been associated with concepts of power, fertility, and "privileged maleness" [30, p. 46; 31, p. 34]. In historical periods, the bull was the primary animal attribute of powerful storm gods across Syria and Anatolia [31, p. 35]. In Late Bronze Age Cyprus, the bull represented a form of economic and symbolic capital, conveying messages of wealth and prestige [20, p. 9]. Its presence in tombs and sanctuaries suggests it also had deep religious connotations [20, p. 9]. The production of hundreds of these vessels, sharing a common form and material, reflects a set of symbols that was widely understood across the island [32, p. 644].

The desirability of the form is further evidenced by the production of local imitations in the Levant. At sites like Deir el-Balah, Canaanite potters created their own versions of Base Ring vessels [33, p. 141]. These imitations replicated the general shape but often used different manufacturing techniques, such as attaching a loop handle to the exterior rather than inserting a strap handle through the vessel wall, demonstrating an adaptation of a foreign idea to local craft traditions [33, p. 141].

The Base Ring bull vessel's production period came to a close at the end of the Late Cypriot IIC period. Its use went into a terminal decline and finally disappeared during LC IIIA (c. 1200–1100 BCE) [6, p. 189]. It was succeeded by a new type, the Buff Painted Bull, which continued the tradition of zoomorphic vessels but with a different fabric and style, marking a transition in Cypriot material culture at the turbulent turn of the 12th century BCE [6, p. 189].

Conclusion

The Late Bronze Age Base Ring bull vessel is far more than a simple ceramic container. It is a product of a highly specialized craft tradition, likely centered on a specific geological resource in southwestern Cyprus but distributed throughout the island and its trading sphere. It functioned in multiple arenas of life and death: as a grave good for the elite, as a utilitarian object in industrial zones, and as a sacred offering in cultic rituals. Its form and wear patterns suggest it was a functional pouring vessel, repeatedly used for dispensing valuable liquids.

The precise nature of those liquids remains a point of scholarly contention. While the specter of opium continues to animate the discussion, the balance of evidence currently points toward a more varied cargo, dominated by precious oils and unguents. Regardless of its contents, the vessel’s social function appears linked to acts of ceremonial consumption and display, where its potent symbolism could be invoked. The bull, an ancient emblem of power and divinity, was materialized in clay and activated in rituals that affirmed social status, honored the dead, and communicated with the divine.

Key questions still await definitive answers. Further lead isotopic analysis on a broader range of Base Ring sherds could confirm or complicate the single-source production model. More extensive residue analysis, particularly of vessels from secure, primary contexts, is needed to resolve the debate over their contents. Finally, a deeper investigation into the consistent association of these vessels with areas of craft production may illuminate the relationship between ritual practice and the vital economic activities, like metallurgy, that underpinned the prosperity of Late Bronze Age Cyprus. The Base Ring bull, mute for over three millennia, continues to provoke inquiry, embodying the complex interplay of technology, trade, and belief in a connected Bronze Age world.

References

  1. Horejs, B. (Ed.). (2016). *10th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East: Abstract booklet* (10th ICAANE, April 25-29, 2016, Vienna, Austria). Austrian Academy of Sciences.
  2. 10th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. (2016, April 25-29). Abstract booklet. Austrian Academy of Sciences.
  3. Niesiołowski-Spanò, Ł., & Węcowski, M. (Eds.). (2018). *Change, continuity, and connectivity: North-Eastern Mediterranean at the turn of the Bronze Age and in the early Iron Age*. Harrassowitz Verlag.
  4. Novacek, G. V. (2011). Ancient Israel: Highlights from the collections of the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago. The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
  5. Steel, L. (2020). Feats of Clay: Considering the Materiality of Late Bronze Age Cyprus. Sustainability, 12(17), 6942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176942
  6. Knox, D.-K. (2012). *Making sense of figurines in Bronze Age Cyprus: A comprehensive analysis of Cypriot ceramic figurative material from EC I – LC IIIA (c.2300BC – c.1100BC)* [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester].
  7. Dissinger, A. M. (2017). Cypro-Archaic bird iconography: Types, uses, and meanings (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia).
  8. Caloi, I., & Langohr, C. (Eds.). (2018). *Technology in Crisis: Technological changes in ceramic production during periods of trouble*. Presses universitaires de Louvain.
  9. Steel, L. (2010). Late Cypriot ceramic production: Heterarchy or hierarchy? In D. Bolger & L. C. Maguire (Eds.), *Development of pre-state communities in the ancient Near East* (pp. 106–?). Oxbow Books.
  10. Jones, R. E. (1986). A review of scientific studies: Greek and Cypriot pottery (Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper 1). The British School at Athens.
  11. Cannavò, A., & Thély, L. (Eds.). (2018). Les royaumes de Chypre à l’épreuve de l’histoire: Transitions et ruptures de la fin de l’âge du Bronze au début de l’époque hellénistique (Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. Supplément, Vol. 60). École française d’Athènes.
  12. Yener, K. A. (Ed.). (2010). Tell Atchana, Ancient Alalakh, Volume 1: The 2003–2004 excavation seasons. Koç Üniversitesi.
  13. Jones, R. E. (1986). *Greek and Cypriot pottery: A review of scientific studies* (Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper 1). The British School at Athens.
  14. Renson, V., Jacobs, A., Coenaerts, J., Mattielli, N., Nys, K., & Claeys, P. (2013). Using lead isotopes to determine pottery provenance in Cyprus: Clay source signatures and comparison with Late Bronze Age Cypriote pottery. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 28(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21454
  15. Panitz-Cohen, N., & Mazar, A. (Eds.). (2006). *Timnah (Tel Batash) III: The finds from the second millennium BCE* (Qedem Monographs of the Institute of Archaeology, No. 45). The Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  16. Benzi, M. (2007). LB III trade in the Dodecanese: An overview. In S. Deger-Jalkotzy & M. Zavadil (Eds.), LH III C Chronology and Synchronisms: Proceedings of the International Workshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences at Vienna, May 7th and 8th, 2007 (pp. 47-54). Austrian Academy of Sciences.
  17. Graziadio, G. (2025). The Aegean and Cyprus: Interaction Between Two Distinct Cultural Mediterranean Areas from the Third Millennium to Ca 1200 BC. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari – Venice University Press. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-857-6
  18. Helft, S. (2010). *Patterns of exchange/patterns of power: A new archaeology of the Hittite Empire* [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania].
  19. Reeve, A. H. (2021). *Ancient Cyprus in Leeds: Objects, networks and museums from 1870 to 1947* [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Leeds].
  20. Steel, L. (2021). Heterotopias and hospitality: What happened in Room 103 at Aredhiou? In Z. Chovanec & W. Crist (Eds.), *All things Cypriot: Studies on ancient environment, technology, and society in honor of Stuart Swiny* (pp. 105–110). American Society of Overseas Research.
  21. Fischer, P. M., & Bürge, T. (2015). The new Swedish Cyprus expedition 2014: Excavations at Hala Sultan Tekke: Preliminary results. *Opuscula: Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome*, *8*, 28–.
  22. Fischer, P. M., & Bürge, T. (2014). The new Swedish Cyprus Expedition 2014: Excavations at Hala Sultan Tekke preliminary results. Opuscula. Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome, 7, 27–49.
  23. Papalexandrou, N. (2021). Review of Ρυθμοί της Κυπριακής Κεραμικής: Σύντομη Επισκόπηση με βάση τη Συλλογή του Αρχαιολογικού Μουσείου του Τμήματος Ιστορίας και Αρχαιολογίας του Εθνικού και Καποδιστριακού Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών [Styles of Cypriot Pottery: A Brief Survey on the Basis of the Collection in the Archaeological Museum, Department of History and Archaeology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens], by N. Kourou & G. Bourgiannis. *CLARA Review*, (7), 1-4.
  24. Steel, L. (2007). Egypt and the Mediterranean world. In T. Wilkinson (Ed.), *The Egyptian world* (pp. 459–468). Routledge.
  25. Chovanec, Z., Bunimovitz, S., & Lederman, Z. (2015). IS THERE OPIUM HERE? – ANALYSIS OF CYPRIOT BASE RING JUGLETS FROM TEL BETH-SHEMESH, ISRAEL. *Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry*, *15*(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16609
  26. Dikomitou-Eliadou, M., Psaras, M., & Kiely, T. (Eds.). (2019, April 5). *Cypriot archaeology, pre-modern material culture, and cultural heritage in the UK: Programme & Abstracts* [Symposium]. Institute of Archaeology, University College London.
  27. Chovanec, Z., Bunimovitz, S., & Lederman, Z. (2015). Is there opium here? – Analysis of Cypriot Base Ring juglets from Tel Beth-Shemesh, Israel. *Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 15*(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16609
  28. Schreiber, N. (2003). *The Cypro-Phoenician pottery of the Iron Age* (Culture and history of the ancient Near East, Vol. 13). Brill.
  29. Steel, L. (2004). A goodly feast… a cup of mellow wine: Feasting in Bronze Age Cyprus. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 73(2), 281–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134896
  30. Burich, J. A. (2014). *Catching fire: Toward a cognitive-processual analysis of Cypriot pyrotechnics and sacred imagery during the Bronze Age* (Unpublished senior honors thesis). University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
  31. Schwemer, D. (2008). The Storm-Gods of the Ancient Near East: Summary, Synthesis, Recent Studies. Part II. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions, 8(1), 1–85.
  32. Knapp, A. B., & van Dommelen, P. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge prehistory of the Bronze and Iron Age Mediterranean. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Killebrew, A. E. (1999). Ceramic craft and technology during the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages: The relationship between pottery technology, style, and cultural diversity [Doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem].