
Bellapais Vounous
An important Early and Middle Bronze Age cemetery site on the northern coast of Cyprus, known for its rich ceramic assemblages and detailed insights into ancient funerary practices.
A Community Revealed Through Its Cemetery: Bellapais Vounous and the Cypriot Early Bronze Age
On the northern coast of Cyprus, near the modern village of Bellapais, lies a series of gentle slopes that hold the remains of an Early to Middle Bronze Age community [1, p. 1]. Yet this community is known to us almost exclusively through its dead. The extensive cemetery of Bellapais Vounous, excavated primarily in the 1930s, offers a detailed, if indirect, view of a society that flourished for nearly five centuries [2, p. 303]. Despite extensive searches, the associated settlement has never been located, leaving the necropolis as the sole source of information for the lives, beliefs, and social structures of its people [3, p. 4; 4, p. 142]. This absence of a settlement record forces a unique archaeological perspective, where the narrative of the living must be constructed from the architecture and material culture of the grave. The evidence from Vounous shows a community with complex mortuary practices, distinctive artistic traditions, and a dynamic social landscape that shifted over time, eventually yielding its regional prominence to a nearby rival.
This article will examine the archaeological evidence from Bellapais Vounous to reconstruct the world of its inhabitants. It will first outline the site’s discovery and chronology, before exploring its distinct mortuary practices, from tomb construction to the treatment of the dead. It will then analyze the rich material culture—ceramics, metalwork, and unique figurative objects—as indicators of craft production, social status, and belief systems. Finally, it will place Vounous within its regional context, charting its relationship with the nearby site of Lapithos to understand the shifting balance of power on the north coast of Early Bronze Age Cyprus.
Discovery and Chronology of a Necropolis
The archaeological significance of Vounous was established through a series of excavations in the 1930s by Porphyrios Dikaios of the Cyprus Museum, C.F.A. Schaeffer for the Louvre, and James and Eleanor Stewart for the British School at Athens [2, p. 303; 1, p. 1]. These campaigns uncovered over 164 tomb complexes across two main areas, designated Site A and Site B [5, p. 351]. Subsequent analysis revealed a clear chronological progression. Site A dates almost exclusively to the Early Cypriot I (EC I) period, while Site B represents a direct continuation, with tombs dating from Early Cypriot II through Middle Cypriot II (EC II–MC II) [5, p. 351; 3, p. 164]. Together, the two sites provide a near-uninterrupted sequence from approximately 2250 BCE to the 18th century BCE [6, p. 2].
The tombs themselves are rock-cut chambers, typically rounded or oval in shape, accessed via a downward-sloping entrance passage, or dromos [6, p. 3; 1, p. 1]. These dromoi were sealed with large stone slabs, often secured with smaller stones at the base [3, p. 39]. While most tombs are simple subterranean facilities, some display unusual architectural elaboration. At Vounous Site A, Tombs 114, 116, and 117 feature entrances with carved facades that imitate vertical posts and horizontal lintels, perhaps reflecting the domestic architecture of the unlocated settlement [5, p. 349; 6, p. 3]. Such features, also found at nearby Karmi and Lapithos, suggest that certain tombs were conceived as permanent markers in the landscape, intended to be seen and revisited [7, p. 59]. The size of the tomb chambers also increased significantly over time; the mean floor area at Site B was nearly double that of Site A, growing from 3.68 m² to 7.16 m² [8, p. 61]. This expansion suggests changes in the composition of burial groups or an increase in the scale of funerary ceremonies.
The Architecture of Death: Burial Practices and Ritual
The Vounous tombs were not single-use graves but were reopened for successive interments over many years [8, p. 50]. This practice of reuse led to complex arrangements of skeletal remains and grave goods within the chambers. In many tombs, the remains of earlier burials were swept aside to make room for new ones [3, p. 39]. In Tomb 17, for instance, a well-preserved primary interment was found in situ, while the disarticulated bones of at least four earlier individuals had been piled in a mass along the southern side of the chamber [3, p. 39].
The evidence points to mortuary programs far more complex than simple inhumation. At both Vounous A and B, excavators documented instances of secondary burial and the deliberate manipulation of human remains [8, p. 43; 5, p. 352]. In Tomb 164A at Vounous A, two skulls were found separated from their postcranial remains, suggesting they had been intentionally moved [8, p. 43]. A similar emphasis on the curation of skulls is apparent in other tombs, where burials were represented mainly by skulls and a few long bones [5, p. 359]. In some cases, the long bones of multiple individuals appear to have been deliberately grouped together [8, p. 43]. These practices suggest a multi-stage ritual process, where the dead were not simply interred and forgotten but were actively engaged with long after death, perhaps as part of an ancestor cult [9, p. 9; 7, p. 61].
Funerary ceremonies at Vounous also involved significant communal activities, most notably feasting. Large quantities of animal bones—primarily from adult cattle, but also sheep and goat—were found inside the tomb chambers [6, p. 12; 10, p. 14]. The presence of cranial and foot bones, in addition to meat-bearing parts, indicates that animals were slaughtered and butchered at or near the cemetery [6, p. 12]. The deposition of entire articulated joints suggests that portions of the feast were placed in the tomb with the deceased [6, p. 12]. This routine investment of agricultural surplus in funerary feasting points to the high cost of these events and their importance as occasions for communal gathering and social display [10, p. 14].
The human remains from Vounous have unfortunately not been subject to modern, detailed osteological analysis, a common issue with early excavations [11, p. 135; 12, p. 2]. Early reports suggest a potential bias towards the inclusion of males in the tombs, while children seem to be significantly underrepresented [5, p. 346; 13, p. 84]. At Vounous, children's skeletons accounted for only 6% of the remains, a figure far below the expected mortality rate for a pre-modern population [13, p. 84]. This suggests that chamber tomb burial was not extended to all members of the community and that other, archaeologically invisible, mortuary practices may have existed for children and possibly some women [8, p. 53].
The Material World of Vounous: Ceramics
The most abundant finds from the Vounous tombs are ceramics, predominantly of the Red Polished (RP) ware characteristic of the period [3, p. 103]. The potters supplying the Vounous community were highly skilled, producing vessels that stand out for their technical and aesthetic quality. The northern RP ware is routinely burnished to a high lustre and fired in controlled conditions to produce distinct black tops and interiors on certain bowl types [10, p. 9]. This contrasts sharply with the wares from southern and central Cyprus, which are typically mottled and less finely finished [10, p. 9]. This regional distinction shows that Vounous was a center for a sophisticated ceramic tradition.
The assemblage is not merely utilitarian. Many vessels appear to have been made specifically for funerary or ritual use [14, p. 6]. These include composite vessels made of multiple small pots joined together, askoi (animal-shaped vessels), and large bowls decorated with modeled birds, stags, snakes, and bulls [8, p. 64; 15, p. 43]. Such "cult vessels" were broadly distributed throughout the cemetery, found in nearly half of the tombs at Site A, suggesting they were part of a widely shared set of ceremonial equipment rather than restricted to a small elite [8, p. 64].
Among the most remarkable finds is the so-called "Vounous Bowl" or "sacred enclosure model," recovered from Tomb 22 at Site B [8, p. 64]. This large Red Polished bowl contains a detailed scene of thirty-one human and animal figures within a circular, walled enclosure [7, p. 54]. The scene includes individuals seated on benches, a prominent figure on a larger chair or throne, cattle in pens, and figures who appear to be engaged in ritual activities [8, p. 64; 13, p. 88]. The interpretation of this object has been a subject of continuous debate. Dikaios, its excavator, identified it as a sacred enclosure [16, p. 45]. Others have seen it as a depiction of a funerary ceremony, an ancestor cult, or simply a scene of daily village life [9, p. 1; 16, p. 45; 17, p. 59]. More recently, scholars have interpreted it as a representation of an emerging social hierarchy, with a male leader presiding over a ritually sanctioned feast designed to legitimize his authority [8, p. 76; 6, p. 21]. Complicating this interpretation, however, is the fact that Tomb 22 was otherwise unimpressive in its contents, which might argue against the bowl being an exclusive symbol of elite power [8, p. 64; 17, p. 59].
In addition to elaborate vessels, the Vounous tombs contained a variety of ceramic figurative objects. These include schematic 'plank figurines,' which are flat, rectangular representations of the human form, as well as ceramic models of inanimate objects [13, p. 84; 8, p. 64]. The models are non-functional, life-size replicas of items such as copper-alloy knives and their leather sheaths, spindles, and cattle horns [11, p. 135]. Their careful manufacture and deposition in tombs suggest they were created specifically for mortuary ritual [18, p. 52]. While it was once proposed that these ceramic models were inexpensive substitutes for their more valuable metal counterparts, this theory is undermined by finds like that in Tomb 45, which contained both a copper-alloy knife and a ceramic model of one [11, p. 135]. It is more likely these objects held a symbolic meaning of their own, perhaps representing the tools and technologies that defined an individual's identity in life [18, p. 55].
Metal, Status, and Society
The deposition of metal artifacts in the Vounous tombs provides one of the clearest indicators of social and economic change over time. The objects are predominantly made of copper, with only a few examples of true tin-bronze [3, p. 238]. The assemblage includes weapons such as daggers and hook-tang weapons (likely spearheads), tools like axes, knives, and awls, and personal items like pins and tweezers [8, p. 64].
The distribution of these metal goods was not static. At Vounous A (EC I), copper-based objects were found in just under half of the tombs [8, p. 64]. Their distribution was discontinuous, with a few tombs containing notable concentrations of metal, suggesting the existence of some wealth and status differentials within the community [5, p. 366; 8, p. 65]. The three richest tombs in metal were also among the largest and were located along the highest elevation of the cemetery, hinting at a spatial organization based on status [5, p. 366].
During the earlier phase of Vounous B (EC II–EC IIIA), the consumption of metal declined sharply, occurring in only 27% of tombs [8, p. 65]. This might reflect a real shortage of copper, a possibility supported by the appearance of ceramic models of daggers and sheaths during this period, perhaps as substitutes for scarce metal originals [8, p. 65; 5, p. 369].
This trend reversed dramatically in the later phase of Vounous B (EC IIIB–MC II). Metal consumption escalated markedly, with copper artifacts found in 75% of tombs [8, p. 65]. The distribution of metal became more continuous across the cemetery, which may indicate increasing prestige competition, where the display of wealth was an active tool for creating and negotiating status rather than reflecting fixed, hereditary ranks [8, p. 65]. This shift was also accompanied by a change in the types of metal objects deposited. While weapons still appeared, pins and "toilet" articles like razors and tweezers became more common, perhaps suggesting a greater emphasis on personal ornamentation [8, p. 65].
Evidence for long-distance trade at Vounous is rare but important. A few tombs contained imported goods, including Syro-Palestinian pottery jars and faience beads [5, p. 363; 19, p. 3]. Tomb 164B held a jug of probable Palestinian origin alongside pieces of sheet gold [5, p. 369]. Minoan bronze daggers were also found in Tombs 19 and 143 [5, p. 389]. While these finds show that the Vounous community was connected to wider Mediterranean exchange networks, it appears that only groups with greater access to local copper resources were likely to participate in these long-distance exchanges [5, p. 375].
A Shifting Regional Landscape: Vounous and Lapithos
Vounous was not an isolated community. It was part of a dynamic north coast region that also included the major cemetery at Lapithos Vrysi tou Barba, located about 20 km to the west [5, p. 353]. The relationship between these two centers changed over time, with Vounous initially holding a dominant position. During EC I-II, Vounous appears to have been the paramount center of an "ancient social territory" stretching along the coast [20, p. 64; 13, p. 86]. Its primacy is expressed through its highly innovative and complex ceramic iconography, which was central to the development of funerary ritual across the region [6, p. 21].
By EC III, however, the balance of power began to shift. The quantity of metal deposited in tombs increased dramatically at both sites, but the trajectory at Lapithos was steeper and more sustained [6, p. 21]. Over the entire Bronze Age, the quantity of metal recovered at Lapithos was almost three times that from Vounous [21, p. 12]. The incidence of specific weapon types is particularly instructive. Spearheads, rare in EC I-II, become common at both sites in EC III–MC I, a period of potential rivalry. By MC II, however, they have almost completely disappeared at Vounous while their numbers and size continue to increase at Lapithos [21, p. 13; 22, p. 9]. This sharp divergence suggests that Lapithos was gaining control over copper procurement and production networks [23, p. 19]. While Vounous entered a period of decline, eventually ceasing to be used in the late MC II period, Lapithos became a major manufacturing and distribution center, prefiguring the rise of the large urban centers of the Late Bronze Age [22, p. 8].
Conclusions
Bellapais Vounous provides a compelling example of how a community's identity, beliefs, and social dynamics can be read through its treatment of the dead. For centuries, this northern Cypriot necropolis was the focal point for a society that invested heavily in the rituals of death. Funerary ceremonies were elaborate, multi-stage events involving feasting, the manipulation of ancestral remains, and the deposition of finely crafted and symbolically charged objects. The material record charts the community's evolution from a regionally dominant center with a unique ritual iconography to one engaged in broader and more intense prestige competition, a process marked by a dramatic inflation in the mortuary consumption of metal.
The story of Vounous is also one of shifting regional fortunes. Its eventual eclipse by Lapithos demonstrates that the Early and Middle Bronze Age in Cyprus was not a period of static, uniform village life. Instead, it was a time of significant social and economic dynamism, where competition for resources like copper could lead to the rise and fall of local centers of power. This challenges the notion that social complexity in Cyprus appeared abruptly around 1700 BCE, suggesting instead that its foundations were laid much earlier on the north coast [23, p. 19].
Significant questions about Vounous remain. The foremost among them is the location and nature of its settlement, the discovery of which would transform our understanding of the relationship between the worlds of the living and the dead [3, p. 4]. Furthermore, the lack of modern bioarchaeological analysis of the skeletal remains from the early excavations limits what can be said about the demography, diet, health, and genetic affinities of the population [11, p. 135; 12, p. 2]. Despite these limitations, the cemetery of Bellapais Vounous remains a critical site, a silent testament to a Bronze Age community whose complex social and ritual life continues to be revealed through the careful study of its dead.
References
- Stewart, E., & Stewart, J. (1950). Vounous, 1937-38. Swedish Institute in Rome.
- Jones, R. E. (1986). *Greek and Cypriot pottery: A review of scientific studies* (Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper 1). The British School at Athens.
- Dikaios, P. (1938). The excavations at Vounous-Bellapais in Cyprus, 1931-2. Archaeologia, 88, 1-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261340900014557
- Gagné, L. A. C. (2012). Middle Cypriot White Painted Ware: A study of pottery production and distribution in Middle Bronze Age Cyprus [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto].
- Keswani, P. S. (2005). Death, prestige, and copper in Bronze Age Cyprus. *American Journal of Archaeology*, *109*(3), 341–401. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40026118
- Webb, J. M., & Frankel, D. (2010). Social Strategies, Ritual and Cosmology in Early Bronze Age Cyprus: An Investigation of Burial Data from the North Coast. Levant, 42(2), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1179/175638010X12797237885776
- Steel, L. (2013). The social world of Early-Middle Bronze Age Cyprus: Rethinking the Vounous Bowl. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 26(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmea.v26i1.51
- Keswani, P. (2005). *Mortuary ritual and society in Bronze Age Cyprus*. Equinox Publishing.
- Steel, L. (2013). The social world of Early-Middle Bronze Age Cyprus: Rethinking the Younous Bowl. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 26(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmea.v26i1.5152
- Webb, J. M., & Frankel, D. (2013). Cultural regionalism and divergent social trajectories in Early Bronze Age Cyprus. *American Journal of Archaeology*, *117*(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.3764/aja.117.1.0059
- Knox, D.-K. (2012). *Making sense of figurines in Bronze Age Cyprus: A comprehensive analysis of Cypriot ceramic figurative material from EC I – LC IIIA (c.2300BC – c.1100BC)* [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester].
- Bright, L. (n.d.). A possible case for the practice of abandonment during the Late Cypriot and Cypro-Geometric periods. In Unknown Editor(s), *Klados: Essays in honour of J. N. Coldstream* (BICS Supplement 63, pp. 35-37). Unknown Publisher.
- Yildiz, N. (2018). Vounous revisited: Teaching history through a symposium and a ceramic workshop. *Arts & Humanities Open Access Journal*, *2*(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.15406/ahoaj.2018.02.00037
- Webb, J. M. (n.d.). Pots and People: An Investigation of Individual and Collective Identities in Early Bronze Age Cyprus.
- Barker, C. (Ed.). (2012). Aphrodite’s Island: Australian Archaeologists in Cyprus. The Nicholson Museum, The University of Sydney.
- Christou, S. (2012). *Sexually ambiguous imagery in Cyprus from the Neolithic to the Cypro-Archaic Period* (BAR International Series 2329). BAR Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407309125
- Burich, J. A. (2014). *Catching fire: Toward a cognitive-processual analysis of Cypriot pyrotechnics and sacred imagery during the Bronze Age* (Unpublished senior honors thesis). University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
- Knox, D. (n.d.). Figurines and igurative vessels at Early Cypriot Bellapais Vounous. In [Volume Title Unknown] (pp. 47-). [Publisher Unknown].
- Crewe, L. (2012). Beyond copper: Commodities and values in Middle Bronze Cypro-Levantine exchanges. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 31(3), 225–243.
- Webb, J. M. (2013). ‘The mantle of Vasilia’: have Stewart’s views on the centrality of the copper trade in prehistoric Bronze Age Cyprus stood the test of time? In [Editor(s) Name(s)] (Ed(s).), *[Title of Book]* (pp. 59-). [Publisher].
- Bourogiannis, G., & Mühlenbock, C. (Eds.). (2016). Ancient Cyprus Today: Museum Collections and New Research. Åströms förlag.
- Webb, J. M. (2018). Shifting Centres: Site Location and Resource Procurement on the North Coast of Cyprus over the Longue Durée of the Prehistoric Bronze Age. Land, 7(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020064
- Pilides, D., & Mina, M. (Eds.). (2017). *Four decades of hiatus in archaeological research in Cyprus: Towards restoring the balance: Proceedings of the international one-day workshop, held in Lefkosia (Nicosia) on 24th September 2016, hosted by the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus* (Κυπριακά – Forschungen zum Antiken Zypern / Studies on Ancient Cyprus, Vol. 2). Verlag Holzhausen GmbH.