Lawyer / legislator · Colonial official
William Collyer
fl. 1883–1886 · United Kingdom
British lawyer in Cyprus who, as Queen's Advocate, defended Falkland Warren in Watkins v. Warren in 1885-86 and may earlier have acted for Cesnola against Ohnefalsch-Richter.
Biography
William Collyer was the Queen's Advocate who defended Falkland Warren when Charles Watkins sued him over the excavation at Frangissa. Michael Given calls him "the Queen's Advocate and therefore the leading government lawyer and in effect a subordinate of Warren"1. The case was heard before Judge Charles Walpole from December 1885 to January 1886. Collyer argued that Warren's jurisdiction was limited to his own office and that Warren had not abused his position; Given calls this a brief argument made of bold assertions without evidence1. When the Frangissa contract disappeared in court, Collyer joked with the judge about the Government Engineer's lack of boxes for papers, an exchange Given reads as cronyism1. Warren won. Warren's opponent in court was the advocate Ulick Burke1.
A "Mr. Collyre", described as a British lawyer in Cyprus, appears earlier in Marangou's account of Luigi Palma di Cesnola. After Max Ohnefalsch-Richter published an article in the Cyprus Herald on 6 October 1883, Cesnola told his agent George Menardos to find the best English lawyer in Cyprus. According to Marangou, "the case was taken in Cyprus by Mr. Collyre, who agreed that there was a case and undertook to defend the General"2. In 1884 Menardos and Collyre took statements from Cesnola's workmen Theocharis, Lazaris and Mustafa, and from others in Paphos and Limassol2. Marangou gives no forename and does not say that this Collyre was the Queen's Advocate; the name and the decade are the only link. Nothing is recorded of his life outside these years.
Life and work
- 1883–1885As 'Mr. Collyre', a British lawyer in Cyprus, took on Cesnola's proposed libel case against Ohnefalsch-Richter (after Richter's Cyprus Herald article of 6 Oct 1883), agreeing there was a case and undertaking to defend the General; it was generally thought pointless to sue Richter. Whether a suit was filed is not in the pages read.
CyprusMarangou 2000, p. 336
- 1884With Menardos took the testimonies of Cesnola's workmen Theocharis, Lazaris and Mustafa, and of people in Paphos and Limassol, on Cesnola's behalf.
CyprusMarangou 2000, p. 337
- December 1885 – January 1886As Queen's Advocate defended Chief Secretary Falkland Warren in Charles Watkins's suit over the Frangissa (Pera) excavation before Judge Charles Walpole. Argued that 'Colonel Warren's jurisdiction is limited to his own office' and that Warren had not abused his position (Cyprus Herald 9 Jan 1886, 2, as quoted by Given). Joked in court with the judge about the missing contract. Warren won; Watkins paid costs.
LarnacaGiven 2001, pp. 258-259
- December 1885 – January 1886Civil suitCounsel for the defendant Falkland Warren in Watkins v. Warren; not a party.
Connections
7 peopleSales, gifts & bequests
- Agent for Luigi Palma di Cesnolaprobably1883–1885
- Agent for Falkland Warren1885–1886
Disputes & the law
- In litigation with Charles F. Watkins1885–1886
- In litigation with Ulick Burke1885–1886
Colleagues & contacts
- Worked with George Menardos1883–1885
- Connected with Lazarisprobably1884
- Connected with Falkland Warren1885–1886
- Connected with Charles Walpole1886
Sources
- 1.Michael Given (2001). “The fight for the past: Watkins vs. Warren (1885-6) and the control of excavation”. Cyprus in the 19th Century AD: Fact, Fancy and Fiction, 255-260. London, British Museum.
- 2.A. G. Marangou (ed.) (2000). The Consul Luigi Palma di Cesnola 1832-1904: Life and Deeds.