Page 72Scan 69 of 95
at the bottom levelIt is not excluded that yet another skeleton may have been housed in the tomb on its base closely under skel 5 but of this is only in that case only some insignificant remains preserved (not included on the plan) To this burial (possibly skel 6) would in that case have belonged the vessels from the other vessel-groups strongly isolated vessels 33, 34. The assumption of yet another skeleton in the tomb seems tenable, since skeleton fragments here really were found and since the position of vessels 33, 34 otherwise seems unjustified. Their level figures and their kind prevent their attribution to skel 5. — At the right shinbone skel 3 some insignificant fragments were found of a lower jaw with teeth of a child under 5 years. (skel 7) This jaw cannot be attributed to skel 3 since its lower jaw was found in another place. Other bones in the tomb give at hand that the dead were older than the stated age. Skel 3 seems by all accounts to judge … continues
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain