Unnumbered pageScan 52 of 94
116 date
an east wall to one of second period to match west wall of second period. However it may have been completely destroyed. all corners on NW part of building must be investigated.
But as the east part of north wall cuts soil, it must be later the while it follows line of in west part of second period, it must if bonded be E of part of # third period and the east wall must be part of third period. Check this. The north wall is bonded with north wall. photo of bonding.
Right page
117 date
The easiest and most satisfactory explanation is that this room with its mud walls was all built to the original plan of the bath and was later changed.
Note that in the North east corner we again have evidence of three building periods one with small wall at right o slightly aslant in relation to modern wall later walls the soil which covers this wall and lastly the cutting of this soil by walls of bath.
as the east side of wall would proba in all probability be long to to bath, the fill in back of it must also belong, for the structure of stones in back of the w east face of east wall is unthinkable without a filling in back. Moreover this filling is necessary for the whole fore court. V. [illegible] p. 141-43 153
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain