The Cypriot Flask: A Vessel’s Journey Through Time and Trade
Among the diverse corpus of Cypriot ceramics, the flask—a small, often flattened vessel with a narrow neck—stands out for its longevity and adaptability. Its form, familiar from the Chalcolithic to the Roman period, provides a durable record of the island's evolving manufacturing techniques, shifting trade relationships, and changing social practices. While often found in tombs and sanctuaries, suggesting a role in ritual, the flask was also a workhorse of Mediterranean commerce, a container for valuable liquids whose distribution maps the island's connections with the Aegean and the Levant. This article traces the evolution of the Cypriot terracotta flask, examining its changing forms, production methods, contents, and distribution to understand its significance in the island's long history. By following this single vessel type, we can observe broader patterns of cultural interaction, technological adoption, and economic strategy that defined ancient Cyprus.
Early Origins: Chalcolithic and Bronze Age Beginnings
The flask appears in the Cypriot ceramic repertoire as early as the Early to Middle Chalcolithic period (c. 3900–2500 BC) [1, p. C10]. These early vessels, along with bowls, holemouth jars, and bottles, formed a limited range of shapes that mark the period’s pottery production [1, p. C10; 2, p. 345]. A key morphological innovation of the Early Chalcolithic was the introduction of small to medium-sized flasks with pointed bases and lug handles, a design that disappears by the end of the period [3]. The pointed base would have made the vessels unable to stand on their own, suggesting they were suspended by ropes or nets for transport or storage [3]. This form, potentially aiding balance, may indicate a function tied to mobility, either as personal water containers or as vessels for traded fluids [3]. Functionally, these early flasks are categorized as vessels for liquid service and short-term transport [1, p. C11; 4, p. 191]. The manufacturing technique for these small, closed vessels involved forming the neck as a solid cone of clay, inserting it into the vessel body, and then piercing it with a stick [5, p. 3].
By the Early Bronze Age, particularly in the Philia phase, the flask became a more established form [6, p. 209; 7, p. 209]. At the southern site of Sotira Kaminoudhia, flasks made of Red Polished South Coast (RPSC) ware dominate the ceramic finds from the cemetery [6, p. 184; 7, p. 184]. These vessels, typically 14 to 20 cm high, have flat bases, a feature that distinguishes them from the round-based flasks of the same period found at northern sites like Bellapais Vounous [6, p. 209; 7, p. 209]. The Kaminoudhia flasks are the most highly decorated vessels at the site, featuring elaborate incised and punctured patterns such as zigzags, chevrons, and herringbone motifs executed with a broad, flat-ended tool [6, p. 184; 7, p. 184]. This high level of decoration and their frequent deposition in tombs suggest they were made for ceremonial or funerary use [6, p. 185; 7, p. 185]. The shape of some Kaminoudhia examples, like P80, is particularly close to Philia phase antecedents, suggesting they may represent an early stage of the type’s development on the south coast [6, p. 209; 7, p. 209].
The onset of the Late Bronze Age (c. 1650 BC) brought significant changes to Cyprus, including the introduction of the potter’s wheel [8, p. 11; 9, p. 25]. This technological innovation, however, was not universally or immediately adopted. The lentoid flask, with its composite body, presented a particular manufacturing challenge for handmade production, as the lower half had to be dried before the upper half could be attached to prevent collapse [10, p. 203]. The potter’s wheel offered a more efficient method, yet handmade flasks continued to be produced alongside wheelmade versions [10, p. 13]. This persistence of older techniques, even when more efficient ones were available, shows that Cypriot potters did not simply discard established motor habits and cultural traditions [11, p. 8].
It was during the Late Bronze Age that the flask became a key player in the expanding networks of Mediterranean trade. Alongside the well-known Base-Ring and White Slip wares, Cyprus produced other vessels for export, including Red Lustrous Wheelmade Ware (RLWW) [12, p. 37]. This ware, characterized by its red, lustrous surface, includes spindle bottles, arm-shaped vessels, and lentoid flasks [13, p. 2]. These were widely distributed and have been found in Hittite temple and domestic contexts, as well as in elite burials on Cyprus [14, p. 12; 15, p. 487].
At the same time, Cyprus became a major consumer of Aegean pottery. From the mid-14th century BC, Mycenaean goods arrived on the island in large quantities [16, p. 186; 17, p. 186]. The trade shifted from tableware to small, closed containers for valuable liquids like wine and perfumed oil [16, p. 186; 17, p. 186]. Among these imports was the globular Mycenaean flask (Furumark Shape 189), which was appreciated for its stylish appearance and lustrous decoration [18, p. 162]. These flasks were an integral part of an export industry likely associated with the Mycenaean palatial economies and their production of perfumed oil [18, p. 162; 19, p. 4]. The presence of these imported flasks alongside locally produced versions illustrates the island's dual role as both a producer and a consumer within a complex system of exchange. The flask was not merely a passive container; its form and the commodities it held were active components in the expression of status and participation in an international consumer culture [20, p. 202].
The Iron Age: An Iconic Cypriot Export
The Iron Age (c. 1050–310 BC) represents a period of intense production and circulation for the Cypriot flask, which became one of the island's most recognizable ceramic exports. The lentoid "pilgrim flask," often decorated with simple concentric circles, was a popular form throughout this era [21, p. 13]. While absorbing influences from its neighbors, Cyprus also became an originator of styles that spread across the eastern Mediterranean. An 11th-century BC flask from Alaas, for example, displays a decorative pattern of radially positioned triangles, a motif rooted in Proto-White Painted ware tradition that continued into the Cypro-Geometric I period and directly influenced the decoration of flasks in Rhodes [22, p. 14]. This demonstrates that Cyprus was a source of stylistic innovation, particularly for the flask shape [22, p. 16]. Furthermore, an Aegean variation with a trefoil rim is considered a refinement of a possible Cypriot original, reinforcing the island’s role as a creative center [22, p. 14].
Alongside its own production, Cyprus continued to import flasks, particularly from Phoenicia. During the Cypro-Geometric period, small Levantine containers were the most common ceramic import on the island, found principally in burial contexts [23, p. 15]. A deposit at Idalion, for example, contained five fragmented Phoenician flasks [23, p. 15]. Residue analysis conducted on similar flasks from Levantine sites has identified cinnamaldehyde, indicating they transported valuable spices like cinnamon [23, p. 15; 24, p. 9]. This trade was not one-way. Cypriot potters produced their own flasks and related small containers, such as barrel juglets, for extensive export to the Levant [25, p. 1; 26, p. 257].
The close interaction between Cyprus and Phoenicia led to a striking similarity in their container forms, sometimes making it difficult to distinguish between imports and local products based on shape alone [27, p. 14]. Scientific analyses, such as petrography and Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA), have been essential in resolving questions of provenance [28, p. 5; 29, p. 161; 30, p. 229]. These studies have shown that the relationship was more complex than a simple import-export model suggests. For instance, a flask from Alaas, stylistically Phoenician, was proven by its Mamonia fabric to have been made in southwestern Cyprus, indicating a system of intra-island distribution for these vessels [27, p. 14]. This finding highlights the need to explore internal Cypriot trade networks alongside international ones.
During the Archaic period, the form of Cypriot transport containers, including flasks, underwent morphological changes. Humbert’s Types D and E, dated to the 6th and early 5th centuries BC, show a trend towards smaller, more elongated bodies with conical bases, replacing earlier flat ones [31, p. 425; 17, p. 425; 32, p. 425]. It is currently impossible to determine whether these changes were typological adjustments to meet the needs of systematic shipping or if they reflect an expansion of production sites on the island [31, p. 425; 17, p. 425]. While there is evidence for eastern Cyprus being a main production center for these containers, the full picture of the island's workshop distribution remains incomplete [31, p. 425; 17, p. 425; 32, p. 425].
Later Manifestations and the Shift to Glass
The terracotta flask continued to be produced into the Hellenistic and Roman periods, though it faced competition from new materials. During the 2nd century BCE, several new forms of small container vessels appeared, including a narrow-necked flask with a large, round, off-center body designed for liquid storage and short transport [33, p. 16]. Another distinct type from this period has a body formed in two parts, a narrow neck, sturdy handles, and an easily stoppered mouth, making it functionally similar to a modern canteen [33, p. 16]. These later terracotta flasks show distinct patterns of distribution, suggesting discrete production and marketing systems for the commodities they held [33, p. 16].
By the Roman period, glass had become a prevalent material for small containers. Excavations at Panayia Ematousa have yielded fragments of free-blown glass flasks, which were typical tableware and cosmetic containers in Roman Cyprus [34, p. 45]. These vessels are characterized by their thin walls, light green or blue color, and spherical or pear-shaped bodies with a folded rim [34, p. 45]. The rise of glass manufacturing represents a significant technological shift that gradually superseded terracotta for certain types of small containers, including the flask. While pottery production continued, especially for utilitarian wares, the long tradition of the terracotta flask as a specialized container for precious liquids began to wane as glass became more widely available [35, p. 61].
Function, Content, and Context
The primary function of the flask throughout its long history was as a container for liquids, particularly valuable ones [33, p. 16; 36, p. 176; 37, p. 7]. Its shape, with a narrow neck to minimize spillage and allow for slow pouring, made it ideal for this purpose [36, p. 176; 21, p. 13; 38, p. 11]. The question of what these liquids were has been a subject of extensive research, combining archaeological context with scientific analysis.
Residue analysis has provided direct evidence of their contents. Studies on Red Lustrous Wheelmade Ware vessels, which include flasks, have identified plant oils, sometimes mixed with other substances like beeswax, bitumen, pine resin, or castor oil [14, p. 11]. This suggests their use for scented products, cosmetics, or medicinal preparations [14, p. 11]. The contents of these vessels appear to vary more by the geographical location of their findspot than by their specific shape, indicating that the ware itself was not associated with a single commodity [14, p. 11]. Later, Phoenician flasks from the Iron Age have been linked to the trade in spices, notably cinnamon [23, p. 15; 24, p. 9]. Other potential contents include wine and, more speculatively, psychoactive substances like opium, which may have been diluted in oil or wine [17, p. 307; 12, p. 37]. It is important to exercise caution, as these substances often appeared in complex mixtures and may have served multiple social, economic, or religious roles that do not fit neatly into modern categories [39, p. 20].
The contexts in which flasks are found offer further clues to their use. The overwhelming majority come from tombs and sanctuaries, pointing to a significant role in ritual and ceremony [22, p. 14; 23, p. 15; 6, p. 184; 7, p. 184; 40, p. 24]. In funerary settings, they were likely deposited as offerings for the deceased, either containing provisions for the afterlife or as remnants of libation ceremonies performed during the burial rites [23, p. 19; 41, p. 60; 42, p. 227]. The high concentration of small, slow-pouring vessels in some tombs suggests the importance of precious liquids or unguents in mortuary practice [23, p. 15]. However, the exact nature of their function in tombs remains a subject of debate; it is often unclear whether the vessels were used in daily life and then deposited, or if they were commissioned specifically for funerary purposes [40, p. 24; 43, p. 24]. The presence of flasks in settlement deposits and shipwrecks further confirms their role in everyday life and long-distance trade [30, p. 131; 16, p. 187].
Conclusion
The Cypriot terracotta flask, in its many forms and wares, offers a focused lens through which to view millennia of the island's history. Its journey begins in the Chalcolithic as a handmade, functional item in a limited local repertoire. In the Bronze Age, it became a vehicle of internationalism, both as an import from the Aegean and as a locally produced commodity like Red Lustrous Wheelmade ware, carrying precious oils and other substances across the Mediterranean. The Iron Age saw the flask mature into an iconic Cypriot product, a staple of the island's export economy and a carrier of stylistic influence to its neighbors, even as it absorbed Phoenician forms and contents. Finally, in the Roman era, its prominence faded as glass technology provided a new medium for small containers.
The flask’s story is one of continuity and change. It consistently served as a container for valuable liquids, a function dictated by its practical form. Yet its materials, manufacturing techniques, decoration, and the specific commodities it carried were constantly evolving in response to technological innovation, market demands, and shifting cultural tastes. Many questions remain. The precise contents of many flasks are still unknown, and the full extent of the complex production and distribution networks, both within Cyprus and between the island and its trading partners, is yet to be charted. Nonetheless, the evidence shows that this simple vessel was far more than a mere container. It was a participant in funerary rituals, a marker of social status, a vehicle of economic exchange, and a medium for cultural expression, making it a small but significant artifact in the long story of ancient Cyprus.
References
- Maliszewski, D. (2013). *Polis-Pyrgos Archaeological Project I: Chalcolithic and Bronze Age Pottery from the Field Survey in Northwestern Cyprus, 1992–1999* (BAR International Series No. 2547). BAR Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407311678
- Vavouranakis, G., & Voskos, I. (Eds.). (2022). *Metioessa: Studies in honor of Eleni Mantzourani* (AURA Supplement 10). National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of History and Archaeology.
- Ceramics: Note on Catalogued Sherds. (n.d.). In *VVP 9* (Section A).
- Peltenburg, E. (Ed.). (2003). The colonisation and settlement of Cyprus: Investigations at Kissonerga-Mylouthkia, 1976-1996. Paul Åströms Förlag (Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Vol. LXX:4).
- Webb, J. M. (1992). Techniques of pottery manufacture at Marki, Cyprus. Report of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus (1992), 13-.
- Swiny, S., Rapp, G. R., & Herscher, E. (Eds.). (2003). *Sotira Kaminoudhia: An early Bronze Age site in Cyprus* (CAARI Monograph Series, Vol. 4; American Schools of Oriental Research Archaeological Reports, No. 08). American Schools of Oriental Research. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015057025549
- Swiny, S., Rapp, G. R., & Herscher, E. (Eds.). (2003). *Sotira Kaminoudhia: An early Bronze Age site in Cyprus*. American Schools of Oriental Research.
- Cadogan, G., Iacovou, M., Kopaka, K., & Whitley, J. (Eds.). (2012). *Parallel lives: Ancient island societies in Crete and Cyprus*. The British School at Athens.
- Cannavò, A., & Thély, L. (Eds.). (2018). Les royaumes de Chypre à l’épreuve de l’histoire: Transitions et ruptures de la fin de l’âge du Bronze au début de l’époque hellénistique (Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. Supplément, Vol. 60). École française d’Athènes.
- Jeffra, C. D. (2011). *The archaeological study of innovation: An experimental approach to the pottery wheel in Bronze Age Crete and Cyprus* [Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter].
- Steel, L. (2010). Late Cypriot ceramic production: Heterarchy or hierarchy? In D. Bolger & L. C. Maguire (Eds.), *Development of pre-state communities in the ancient Near East* (pp. 106–?). Oxbow Books.
- Jasink, A. M., & Bombardieri, L. (Eds.). (2010). *Researches in Cypriote history and archaeology*. Firenze University Press.
- Knappett, C., Kilikoglou, V., Steele, V., & Stern, B. (2005). The circulation and consumption of Red Lustrous Wheelmade ware: petrographic, chemical and residue analysis. *Anatolian Studies*, *55*, 25–59.
- Steele, V. J., & Stern, B. (2017). Red Lustrous Wheelmade ware: Analysis of organic residues in Late Bronze Age trade and storage vessels from the eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 16, 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.06.027
- Graziadio, G. (2025). The Aegean and Cyprus: Interaction Between Two Distinct Cultural Mediterranean Areas from the Third Millennium to Ca 1200 BC. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari – Venice University Press. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-857-6
- Bourogiannis, G. (Ed.). (2022). *Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Classical Period*. Faculty of History and Archaeology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. https://doi.org/10.26247/aurasup.9
- Bourogiannis, G. (Ed.). (2022). *Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Classical Period* (AURA Supplement 9). Faculty of History and Archaeology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
- Pilides, D., & Papadimitriou, N. (Eds.). (2012). *Ancient Cyprus: Cultures in dialogue*. Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.
- Steel, L. (2013). Cyprus during the Late Bronze Age. In The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000–332 BCE (pp. 571–585).
- Georgiou, A. (Ed.). (2012). *Cyprus: An island culture: Society and social relations from the Bronze Age to the Venetian period*. Oxbow Books.
- Reeve, A. (2015). The University of Leeds Ancient Cypriot collection: An overview (Leeds International Classical Studies Discussion Paper No. 3). University of Leeds. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/
- Stampolidis, N. C., & Giannikouri, A. (Eds.). (2012). *Immortality: The earthly, the celestial and the underworld in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze and the Early Iron Age*. University of Crete, Archaeological Institute of Aegean Studies, & Archaeological Institute of Cretological Studies.
- Georgiadou, A., Georgiou, A., & Satraki, A. (2024). A window into mortuary practices and ritual at Early Iron Age Idalion: Locus 20 in the necropolis of Idalion-Platia. In S. G. Schmid & W. M. Kennedy (Eds.), Tühe topography of ancient Idalion and its territory (pp. 201–221). Logos Verlag Berlin.
- Namdar, D., Gilboa, A., Neumann, R., Finkelstein, I., & Weiner, S. (2013). Cinnamaldehyde in early Iron Age Phoenician flasks raises the possibility of Levantine trade with South East Asia. *Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 13*(2), 1-19.
- Gilboa, A. (2012). Cypriot barrel juglets at Khirbet Qeiyafa and other sites in the Levant: Cultural aspects and chronological implications. *TEL AVIV*, *39*, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1179/033443512X13424449373669
- Smith, J. S. (2009). Art and society in Cyprus from the Bronze Age into the Iron Age. Cambridge University Press.
- Gilboa, A., & Goren, Y. (2015). Early Iron Age Phoenician networks: An optical mineralogy study of Phoenician bichrome and related wares in Cyprus. Agypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant, 14, 73–110. https://doi.org/10.2143/AWE.14.0.3108189
- Boness, D., Clarke, J., & Goren, Y. (2015). Ceramic Neolithic pottery in Cyprus—origin, technology and possible implications for social structure and identity. Levant, 47(3), 233–236. doi:10.1080/00758914.2015.1105480
- Gagné, L. A. C. (2012). Middle Cypriot White Painted Ware: A study of pottery production and distribution in Middle Bronze Age Cyprus [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto].
- Killebrew, A. E. (1999). Ceramic craft and technology during the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages: The relationship between pottery technology, style, and cultural diversity [Doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem].
- Bourogiannis, G. (Ed.). (2022). *Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Classical Period* (AURA Supplement No. 9). National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of History and Archaeology.
- Bourogiannis, G. (Ed.). (2022). *Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Classical Period*. Faculty of History and Archaeology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. (AURA Supplement, No. 9).
- Gitin, S. (Ed.). (2015). *The ancient pottery of Israel and its neighbors from the Iron Age through the Hellenistic period (Vol. 2)*. Israel Exploration Society.
- Sørensen, L. W., Destrooper-Georgiades, A., Frederiksen, R., Jacobsen, K. W., & Lund, J. (1998). Third preliminary report of the Danish archaeological excavations at Panayia Ematousa, Aradippou, Cyprus. In S. Dietz & S. Isager (Eds.), Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens II. Aarhus University Press.
- Myres, J. L., & Ohnefalsch-Richter, M. (1899). *A catalogue of the Cyprus Museum: With a chronicle of excavations undertaken since the British occupation and introductory notes on Cypriote archaeology*. Clarendon Press.
- Peltenburg, E., Bolger, D., Croft, P., Goring, E., Irving, B., Lunt, D. A., Manning, S. W., Murray, M. A., McCartney, C., Ridout-Sharpe, J. S., Thomas, G., Watt, M. E., & Elliott-Xenophontos, C. (1998). *Lemba Archaeological Project, Cyprus. Volume II.1B, Excavations at Kissonerga-Mosphilia, 1979-1992*. Department of Archaeology, University of Edinburgh. (Occasional Paper 19).
- Steel, L. (2018). Another look at Red Lustrous arm-vessels. In *Structures of inequality on Bronze Age Cyprus: Studies in honour of Alison K. South* (SIMA PB 187, pp. 197–?). Astrom Editions.
- Institute of Archaeology, University College London. (2019, April 5). Cypriot archaeology, pre-modern material culture, and cultural heritage in the UK: Programme & Abstracts. University College London, London, UK.
- Chovanec, Z. (n.d.). Intoxication on the wine dark sea: Investigating psychoactive substances in the Eastern Mediterranean. In *[Book Title]* (pp. 44-48). [Publisher].
- Karageorgi, S. (2012). *The re-creation and transformation of the archaic art of Cyprus (8th-5th c. BCE) to contemporary art* [Doctoral dissertation, De Montfort University].
- Steel, L. (2013). The social world of Early-Middle Bronze Age Cyprus: Rethinking the Vounous Bowl. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 26(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmea.v26i1.51
- Tekin, O., Kahya, T., & Yacı, A. (Eds.). (2020). Adalya: The Annual of the Koç University Suna & İnan Kıraç Research Center for Mediterranean Civilizations (Vol. 23). Koç University AKMED.
- Karageorgi, S. (2012). *The re-creation and transformation of the archaic art of Cyprus (8th-5th c. BCE) to contemporary art* (PhD thesis, De Montfort University).