The Enigma of Black-on-Red Pottery: New Insights from Megiddo

Black-on-Red pottery is an iconic ceramic style of the Cypriot Iron Age, featuring distinctive black geometric designs painted on a red background. The chronology and origins of this pottery have long been debated by scholars. Some key questions include:

• When did Black-on-Red pottery first appear in Cyprus and the Levant?
• Where was it first produced - in Cyprus, the Levant, or both regions?
• How should the stylistic sequence of Black-on-Red Types III and IV be interpreted chronologically?

Past attempts to address these issues through archaeometric analysis of Black-on-Red sherds found in the Levant were hampered by the use of samples from poorly stratified or unstratified contexts. A new study by Kleiman et al. [1] cuts through this impasse by conducting integrated stratigraphic, chronometric, and provenance analyses on a large dataset of well-contextualized Black-on-Red fragments from the site of Megiddo in Israel.

The Megiddo Contexts

The Black-on-Red sherds analyzed come from the ongoing excavations in Area Q at Megiddo, which provide an ideal testing ground thanks to a well-defined stratigraphic sequence, rich local pottery assemblages, imported Greek and Cypriot wares, and short-lived organic samples for radiocarbon dating.

The key phases are:

• Level Q-7 (Late Iron I, late 11th-early 10th c. BCE) - no Black-on-Red
• Level Q-6 (Early Iron IIA, late 10th c.) - no Black-on-Red
• Level Q-5 (early Late Iron IIA, ca. 900 BCE) - first Black-on-Red appears, found with Greek LPG/EG imports
• Level Q-4 (Late Iron IIA, early-mid 9th c.) - continuity of Black-on-Red
• Level Q-2 (Iron IIB, early 8th c.)

Ceramics and Radiocarbon

Levels Q-5 and Q-4 yielded 61 Black-on-Red sherds total, nearly half from secure floor contexts. Crucially, Level Q-5 already contained examples of both Black-on-Red Types III and IV, conventionally seen as an evolutionary sequence. This co-occurrence suggests they more likely represent contemporary variation. The associated local pottery and four radiocarbon dates place Level Q-5 around 900 BCE, directly challenging the conventional 8th century start date for Black-on-Red Type IV.

Synchronization with the Aegean

The Greek LPG and SPG/EG sherds found together with the earliest Black-on-Red in Level Q-5 further support placing its appearance in the late 10th/early 9th century. This synchronism places Megiddo Level Q-5 near the PG/G transition and the Cypro-Geometric II/III boundary, requiring the latter to be raised. Considering the growing radiocarbon evidence that Aegean PG began only in the late 11th century, the authors propose lowering the start of the Cypriot CG I period to around 1020 BCE.

Provenance and Implications

Neutron activation analysis was conducted on 10 Black-on-Red sherds from Levels Q-5 and Q-4. The results revealed three distinct composition groups differing from Levantine reference material but showing affinities with known Cypriot clay sources. This provides the first definitive evidence that Black-on-Red production was established on Cyprus by 900 BCE and exported at significant scale.

These findings retire the old theory of an early "Levantine Phase," in which Black-on-Red was made on the mainland before Cyprus took it up [1]. That theory goes back to Einar Gjerstad, who gave the ware its name in 1948. He derived it from "the Syro-Anatolian region" and had it become Cypriot around 850 BCE through an influx of Syro-Anatolian settlers, and he was explicit that it had nothing to do with the Phoenicians: "there is no evidence whatsoever that this pottery... has any associations with the Phoenicians" [2]. The Phoenician label came from the other side of the debate, from excavators in Palestine. William Foxwell Albright and Gus Van Beek dated the first Black-on-Red there to the end of the 11th or the early 10th century BCE, dates the Megiddo levels now show to be too high [1]. Kleiman and his colleagues still read the style as reflecting the influence of Phoenician decorative fashions, which spread round the Eastern Mediterranean from the 10th century BCE, while stressing that the ware itself is Cypriot [1].

More broadly, anchoring the start of exported Cypriot Black-on-Red to ca. 900 BCE holds major implications for Iron Age chronologies in the Eastern Mediterranean. On a site-level, it forces a reconsideration of the traditional 10th century BCE dating of the monumental Iron IIA palaces uncovered elsewhere at Megiddo. Maintaining such early dates for the first Black-on-Red would now require discarding the entire suite of radiocarbon evidence, ceramic parallels, and historical correlations underpinning Levantine Iron Age chronology.

What Megiddo Changes

By integrating careful stratigraphy, high-precision radiocarbon dating, and geochemical sourcing, this study makes a compelling case that Cypriot Black-on-Red ware emerged around 900 BCE. That is later than the end of the 11th or early 10th century BCE once proposed from Levantine strata, and only about half a century earlier than Gjerstad's c. 850 BCE [1]. While some stylistic development from Black-on-Red Types III to IV may still have occurred, the evidence from Megiddo establishes that production of both variants was already contemporaneous and being exported in the early 9th century. It places the first production at the very beginning of Cypro-Geometric III and leaves no room for a mainland phase before the Cypriot one [1].

The data from Megiddo offer a way out of the circular reasoning that has long plagued Eastern Mediterranean Iron Age chronology building. The implications extend well beyond Black-on-Red itself, as this realignment will require reevaluating conventional chronologies at numerous sites where this ware has served as a key temporal marker. More fundamentally, the study demonstrates the power of integrating multiple independent lines of archaeological evidence to resolve long-standing chronological disputes in a more empirical manner. Untangling the complex networks that connected Iron Age Cyprus and the Levant will require further research along these rigorous lines. But this study reminds us that to fully realize the chronological potential of a key "fossil" like Cypriot Black-on-Red, we must look beyond Cyprus itself to well-dated consumption contexts abroad.

Corrections and additions

Spotted an error, or know more?

We correct errors of fact and add a dated note saying what was wrong.

We would like to hear about

• An error of fact
• A source or publication we have missed
• Photographs or documents that belong here

Write to us

or alexis@ancientcyprus.com Copy

Tell us if you would like to be thanked by name on the page.