Letter·34 CDF art. 168-4·1 May 1949

Five letters from Dikaios to Schaeffer about the excavations at EnkomiPorphyrios Dikaios

·

Typed in French. Every line is transcribed and translated, and the English sits beside the scan.

Scan 13 of letter 34 CDF art. 168-4 (Five letters from Dikaios to Schaeffer about the excavations at Enkomi), typed in French. The transcription and translation follow.

Scan: Collège de France, Paris, 34 CDF art. 168-4, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Unnumbered pageScan 13 of 20

Enkomi Monastery of St Barnabas 30 May 1949.

Dear friend,

The enclosed letter was written, as you see, several weeks ago already. I held it back in order to be able to give you more details. I am sending it to you today itself, because it contains the state of the planned work at the date of 6 May.

As for the question of the earthquake: I am [handwritten: of my letter of 6 (since)] more and more convinced that it took place in L.C. III. We have not yet reached the Mycenaean ceilings, which show no stratigraphic sign relating to a catastrophe. The layer of destruction was observed between level (or floor) I and II, after which the floors follow one another in a natural manner and without an intermediate layer of destruction. Furumark's opinion (cited in your letter of 19 March) supports my observation. I would like nevertheless to reach the bottom of my stratigraphic layers before declaring myself definitively. That there was a catastrophe of seismic origin in L.C. III seems certain to me. But I would like to reach the bottom of the layers examined by me not before excluding such a catastrophe in the 14th century. I agree with you that even an earthquake of the 5th century may have shaken the walls of Enkomi, but the layer

65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain

Spotted a wrong reading? Write to us or use alexis@ancientcyprus.com