Unnumbered pageScan 5 of 6
, upside down: [?also p. 119Ceramique Evidce. / to save LC III / He considers this / as S E] Limitations, p. 107, neutralized by 107 plus bi dating Mainbuilding 110, 5 ceramique stages p 114 in mid layer tomb. succession of 5 floors, p 114 or 4 (IV+III)
material of floor 5 very important , p. 115 difficulty in combating the indications of an earlier date, e.g. LC III for origin of Mainbuilding, p. 116. floor V and IV very different in composition, p 116, 143 between V + IV = numerous Bronze Age elems, p. 124 floor IV = 1st associated with Mainbuilding, p 124, elsewhere he says V is first.
new difficulty against his dating of Mainbuilding! p 125, 129, 140, 142 147 working against evidence, 149 (evading evidence and ridiculous phrase!) + site used as cemetery, p. 172, implausible story of tomb 19
Arguments against dating original Building 1) No example of architecture so close to such a late period whereas the same architecture RS. before 1200.
2) Sweeping and removing of debris of destr. V only makes sense when reuse of original building or part of it was contemplated [illegible] what did happen (see joins p. 114, 150) otherwise much simpler fill in level built on top.
3) D. never contemplates possibility of intrusion of later pottery in earlier levels, only of earlier into later! (p. 110 ex) But when points doubtful he invents (movement theory! like p. 111 (debut) Important p. 123 solution foreseen by D.
4) Why also so fine architect. at the begin of the XIIth Cent. established and then replaced by this bad rubble a mudbrick construction.
5). floor V cut by builders of
Margin bottom left, written at an angle:
Why, if Dika. wants to sabotage my research there a poison my results why to fault a allusion to reject aside I with my findings a to substitute the contrary ? No hon. expert
Margin bottom right, written at an angle:
The Swedish also did this very careful digging a collect. of material, but their conclus. where nevertheless in the main wrong and Dika. risks a not taking advantage of his predecessors' exper. a work to share this same fate.
Margin right, written sideways:
And why so stubborn and unscientific a approach He wants to sabotage my research a is concerned very Look at Sinda as the Swedes by their research and still continuing opposite to his prior theoretical start inquiries at El A. Tell Doth
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain