Unnumbered pageScan 39 of 85
A 1 Many of the sub*Mycenaean types in 26A are derived from Mycenaean protypes of the L.H.IIIa and early L.H.IIIb periods.
2 The sub-Mycenaean pottery of 26A shows no important contacts with L.H.IIIb:2, and none at all with D.H.IIIc (the Granary style) and Greek sub-Mycenaean.
3 The latest contacts with Greece are shown by the imported jar, which is L.H.IIIb:1, and by latish tendencies of L.H.IIIb:2 reflected in classes IIb,e,p,v,w,x. [handwritten: (this will need precision, but it is about right. j.F.D.)]
4 The main bulk of the 26A pottery is directly derived from L.H.IIIA and L.H.IIIb:1 types, which must have entered the Cypriote sub-Mycenaean style from Greece before the middle of the L.H.IIIb period, for they were not known in Greece after that time.
B 1 Cyprus imported great quantities of Mycenaean pottery in L.H.IIIa and L.H.IIIb:1 (the L.C.II period), but only very little in L.H.IIIb:2 and almost none in L.H.IIIc.
2. Even without conclusive proof one would logically expect that this ware, which was made in Cyprus only, would be based upon the foreign ware actually imported to Cyprus.
3 Luckily there is conclusive proof, since Cyprus is the only land which furnishes the special requirements of this ware; complete familiarity with L.H.IIIa and b:1, and relative isolation afterwards.
a. And the L.H.IIIa-b:1 of Cyprus is the only L.H.IIIa+b:1 which could have given such forms as class IIaa [handwritten: (drawing of a jar)]
[handwritten: The LH III terminology is Hutchinson's (Liverpool Annals 2/XI) LH III A = Enkomi + Tell El Amarna (1400 B.C.) LH III B = Korakou, Zygouries, Lakkithra LH III C = Granary Style - to ca. 1100 (Ware) By LH III B:1 + B2 I mean early + late LH III B]
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain