Letter·34 CDF art. 174·1 October 1930

Letter from Léon Brun, director of the Forges et Aciéries de la Marine, to Schaeffer on the chemical analyses of samplesLéon Brun

·

Typed in French. Every line is transcribed and translated, and the English sits beside the scan.

Scan 1 of letter 34 CDF art. 174 (Letter from Léon Brun, director of the Forges et Aciéries de la Marine, to Schaeffer on the chemical analyses of samples), typed in French. The transcription and translation follow.

Scan: Collège de France, Paris, 34 CDF art. 174, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Unnumbered pageScan 1 of 3

Printed: LÉON BRUN

Printed: DIRECTOR

Printed: OF THE NAVAL FORGES AND STEELWORKS

Printed: HOMECOURT

Printed: (MEURTHE-ET-MOSELLE)

Homécourt, 1 October 1930.

Handwritten: signature

Dear Sir,

I am still studying the two samples you sent me. The chemical analyses carried out show:

- For one: a "mineral" very rich in iron and sulphur, containing a little copper.

If this "mineral" were an iron ore, the examination, in my opinion, would lose much of its interest. But I am fairly convinced that I am dealing with a treatment slag from a copper and iron ore. If so, it would indeed be a very interesting thing; perhaps I shall be able to prove it?

- For the other, which was adhering to a piece of crucible (?), a "mineral" which must have been reduced to powder and which the analysis shows to be a copper carbonate.

As the metallurgical treatment of the first sample may require the use of an oxide which is obtained very easily by roasting a carbonate, this, as you think, is of the greatest interest and would suppose that the metallurgists of that age were most skilful. But one must be very cautious and I need to work on the question further in order to be more affirmative.

.....

65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain

Spotted a wrong reading? Write to us or use alexis@ancientcyprus.com