Page 182Scan 368 of 438
Stamp: blue ink box outline, illegible
The first stage, covering the layout of the building (without great regard to earlier remains on the site) and its earliest use, is marked by the appearance of early Mycenean IIIC: 1 pottery of the style current on the Greek mainland in the early twelfth century B.C. including shapes which are characteristic of the Philistine repertory (1). The appearance of this pottery, which may be dated to the early twelfth century B.C., seems to coincide with the arrival of the Achaean colonists of the literary traditions after the fall of Troy, i.e. at the beginning of the twelfth century (2). It is tempting to regard these colonists as the builders of our compound in its original form.
Handwritten: 2 / two (?) with a line drawn through
The (1) It appears that the immediate prototype of the pottery of the Philistines, who settled in Palestine shortly after 1200 B.C., may be found in the regional Mycenean IIIC: 1 style of Cilicia: cf. Furumark OA III, 264; also Heartly in OpAP V, 108 ff. who emphasises the affinity of the Philistine style with Rhodes and Cyprus. The Philistine elements in the early stages of the compound (Philistine shapes and seal) seem to lend support to the historical tradition regarding an emigration of T[eucri?] from Asia Minor to Cyprus. Cf. Gjerstad, _The colonization of Cyprus in Greek legend_ in OA III, 412.
(2) G.H.I.I. History of Cyprus, I, 83. Also Sir. J. Myres, in BSA XLII, 12. Pr. Schaeffer (_Stratigraphie comparée_ p.598) considers that the evidence collected by him at Enkomi may be in favour of pushing up the date of the fall of Troy into the middle of the thirteenth [illegible]
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain