Unnumbered pageScan 60 of 94
131 134 date
Note there may have been temporary structures used when the mid building walls were first torn down They may even have found it easier to lay down the whole floor and then emplace the pilasters. or
Note on the west side, the cuttings continue in northerly and southerly direction. There may have some form of a wall along this side which was only later taken down after the building after the change from the first period.
Right page
135 114 date
There are three periods and perhaps a fourth here sub period. The first with middle EW wall. and middle NS wall [illegible] This period must be contemporary with the main palace. The second period is marked by the destruction of the middle wall and the third layer which covers them. There is a sub period when the supporting pilasters under went some change in their construction. Either they to were change reinforced or else because they had fallen or were about to follow, or else they were as an original part of the scheme but were only added after the floor was laid holes being left in the floor for their emplacement. Some sort of pilasters. must have existed before the mid walls were destroyed. May not these cuttings represent the change from the temporary structure to the present. Perhaps the temporary structures off or first supports if they were sup not temporary have proved inadequate and later, they had the added
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain