Report·PU-Mu 1050, Box 3, folder 10·1955

Bamboula (…“Seal impressions…”) Benson 1955Jack L. Benson

·

Typed and handwritten in English. Every line is transcribed, and the text sits beside the scan.

Scan 14 of report PU-Mu 1050, Box 3, folder 10 (Bamboula (…“Seal impressions…”) Benson 1955), typed and handwritten in English. The transcription follows.

Scan: Penn Museum Archives, Philadelphia, PU-Mu 1050, Box 3, folder 10, Courtesy of the Penn Museum.

Unnumbered pageScan 14 of 77

11

griffin representations are not uncommon in the Late Bronze Age.[handwritten: 36] Most [handwritten: 37] of these, however, have a different cut and measure from the Bamboula example. Perhaps the most similar one occurs on the blade of a dagger from the Fifth Shaft Grave of Mycenae, which is dated much earlier than, on grounds which[handwritten: 38] will be discussed below, the Bamboula representation can be dated. [handwritten: also] It must be noted that the Bamboula creature does not have the usual crest, as it appears, for example, on a sealing from Zakro [handwritten: 39] executed with fierce realism.

Underlying the representation as a whole - whether it be sea-dog or griffin - is certainly the scheme of decoration which appears on the hearth of the Megaron in the III palace at Mycenae. [handwritten: Late Hellenic] This [handwritten: is a flame or] might be called a wave pattern, the repetitive crests of which challenged the seal cutter to breathe organic life into their rhythm. It is certainly not a common design: nothing much like it occurs in the ceramic repertory, although a somewhat similar argonaut design occurring on several Mycenean pyxides may be cited. All of these considerations bring us to a date, probably a fairly advanced date, in the III period for the Bamboula seal representation; in any case, not earlier than the fourteenth century B.C.

Right page

Sh 5795 two fragments (a,b) from the rim of a large storage jar; [handwritten: Fig.11 Pl. 10]; [handwritten: Fig.10 Pl. 9]; [handwritten: Fig.9 Pl. 8]; [handwritten: Fig.8 Pl. 7] probably a vat. The rim was greatly thickened and squared, which provided a large flat surface on top. [handwritten: Ceramic?] De Clay: pinkish brown throughout but light gray-green to light gray-pink on exterior surface. It is fairly full of fairly large dark sand particles with small white grits and was apparently straw-bound. The surface is quite coarse and rough with many pocks; it chips easily. The sherd may be classified as probably handmade ordinary Late Cypriote III pithos ware.

65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain

Spotted a wrong reading? Write to us or use alexis@ancientcyprus.com