Unnumbered pageScan 37 of 61
Continued from scan 36
… is begun. it seems that it is a matter of the robber trench of the pillar and not of the phantom trace of a f lateral wall. To the east, the same trench does not appear.
Monday 23 September 1996
Continuation of the excavation of UF 105 - Appearance under UF 105 of the lateral wall of the ramps of State 2. (Locus 788) UF 105, which until now was interpreted as the thickness of the ramp of State 2, poses a stratigraphic problem.
After cleaning of the section, new hypothesis. - the floor which supports the layer UF 105 corresponds to state 3 of the ramps.
[(drawing)]
65 figures hard to readstruck struck outadded written in above” jug ditto, and what it repeatsword reading not certain